2011
DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2011.555986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Electoral Reform Fails: The Stability of Proportional Representation in Post-Communist Democracies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The potential victims of this mechanism are easily identifiable, and are almost certainly the legislators from small parties. Along this line, we also find historical elements supporting the diffusion of a high electoral threshold in the reforms of the early 2000s in Belgium (Pilet ), and in the reforms of the 1990s in Slovakia, Slovenia (Nikolenyi ) and the Czech Republic (Kopecky ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The potential victims of this mechanism are easily identifiable, and are almost certainly the legislators from small parties. Along this line, we also find historical elements supporting the diffusion of a high electoral threshold in the reforms of the early 2000s in Belgium (Pilet ), and in the reforms of the 1990s in Slovakia, Slovenia (Nikolenyi ) and the Czech Republic (Kopecky ).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…In accordance with the above mentioned scientific literature this approach is "intuitive, testable, and transparent" (Hallerberg 2011: 39) and has already proved itself to be valuable at conducting the empirical studies, devoted to explanation of political stability and instability causes (Hallerberg 2011;Ganghof 2015). The veto player approach has been applied at studying the electoral reform policy in Ukraine (Herron 2004), in the United Kingdom (Blau 2008), in Slovenia, in the Czech Republic, in Romania (Nikolenyi 2011) and in Belgium (Hooghe, Deschouwer 2011). This model was also used for the analysis of the party reform in Russia in 2001 (Herron 2004) and the Ministry of Internal Affairs reform under the President Dmitriy Medvedev within the period from 2009 to 2011 (Taylor 2014).…”
Section: Literature Review and Theoretical Foundationsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…For example, the rational choice perspective provided important first steps in explaining the causes of electoral change, but once we get into the more complex issue of how the reform process unfolds, these parsimonious approaches quickly become unglued. We need theories that include a wider set of actors and broaden our perspective to encompass those reforms that passed, along with those that did not (Baldini 2011;Hooghe and Deschouwer 2011;Nikolenyi 2011).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the new democracies, electoral system changes take place in very different contexts, and an important question is whether the theories emanating from the study of established democracies explain electoral reform in these cases as well (Nikolenyi 2011). More generally, the question is whether and how determinants of electoral reform vary based on a country's democratic status -whether it is a country undergoing a transition to democracy, a new or fragile democracy, or a non-democracy (Renwick 2011).…”
Section: Expanded Thementioning
confidence: 99%