2023
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1250878
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When drought meets heat – a plant omics perspective

Xiangyu Xu,
Cassio Flavio Fonseca de Lima,
Lam Dai Vu
et al.

Abstract: Changes in weather patterns with emerging drought risks and rising global temperature are widespread and negatively affect crop growth and productivity. In nature, plants are simultaneously exposed to multiple biotic and abiotic stresses, but most studies focus on individual stress conditions. However, the simultaneous occurrence of different stresses impacts plant growth and development differently than a single stress. Plants sense the different stress combinations in the same or in different tissues, which … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 135 publications
(230 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research in wheat has highlighted that drought stress can lower leaf chlorophyll levels by 9%, consequently lowering the photosynthetic rate [46]. This significant alteration in plant physiology due to drought stress translates into reduced plant height, decreased growth rates, fewer tillers, lowered relative water content, diminished seed quality, and, ultimately, significant yield reductions [22]. Plants need to adapt their photosynthetic systems in response to environmental pressures [47].…”
Section: Photosynthetic Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research in wheat has highlighted that drought stress can lower leaf chlorophyll levels by 9%, consequently lowering the photosynthetic rate [46]. This significant alteration in plant physiology due to drought stress translates into reduced plant height, decreased growth rates, fewer tillers, lowered relative water content, diminished seed quality, and, ultimately, significant yield reductions [22]. Plants need to adapt their photosynthetic systems in response to environmental pressures [47].…”
Section: Photosynthetic Ratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These complex weather phenomena, characterized by their unpredictability and severity, jeopardize the resilience of agricultural practices and threaten consistent food supply. Weather patterns are changing due to increasing drought threats and enhancing global temperatures, which is having a detrimental impact on plant growth and productivity [22]. Drought tolerance in plants relies on modifying the photosynthetic system to changing conditions caused by water scarcity [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to stomatal responses, MFSC was shown to have an overall negative effect on other physiological and metabolic processes such as photosynthesis (Hamann, Denney, et al, 2021;Pascual et al, 2023;Pel aez-Vico et al, 2023;Xu et al, 2023) and the accumulation of different osmo-protectants (e.g., proline; Pascual et al, 2023; Figure 2b). These were further associated with an overall decrease in plant growth rate, height, biomass, and yield (Pascual et al, 2023;Pel aez-Vico et al, 2023).…”
Section: The Effects Of Mfsc On Plantsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples of such ‘abiotic stress combination’ events include prolonged droughts combined with heat waves, a heat wave occurring during or following a flood, and alternating cycles of droughts and floods. In multiple studies to date, it was found that in many instances the combination of two different abiotic stresses has a significantly higher negative impact on plant and crop growth and yield, compared to each of the different stress conditions applied individually (e.g., Azodi et al., 2020; Balfagón et al., 2019; Cohen et al., 2021; Gillespie et al., 2012; Orians et al., 2019; Rizhsky et al., 2004; Ruiz‐Vera et al., 2015; Shaar‐Moshe et al., 2019; Sinha et al., 2021; Sinha, Peláez‐Vico, et al., 2023; Slafer & Savin, 2018; Thomey et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2023; Zandalinas et al., 2018; Zinta et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%