2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2018.06.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When does it count? The timing of food stamp receipt and educational performance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper contributes to this important, policy‐relevant discussion by exploring the monthly cyclicality of intimate partner violence and child maltreatment and analyzing how changes in the timing of benefits affect the levels and timing of abuse. In particular, our findings fit into a larger literature suggesting that such benefits are considered fungible, and that the timing effects of government transfers affect other outcomes, including crime (Carr & Packham, 2019; Foley, 2011; Hsu, 2016) and test scores (Cotti, Gordanier, & Ozturk, 2017). We note that any perceived fungibility can contribute to the effects we find, especially if it influences purchases of alcohol or drugs, which are correlates of domestic violence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This paper contributes to this important, policy‐relevant discussion by exploring the monthly cyclicality of intimate partner violence and child maltreatment and analyzing how changes in the timing of benefits affect the levels and timing of abuse. In particular, our findings fit into a larger literature suggesting that such benefits are considered fungible, and that the timing effects of government transfers affect other outcomes, including crime (Carr & Packham, 2019; Foley, 2011; Hsu, 2016) and test scores (Cotti, Gordanier, & Ozturk, 2017). We note that any perceived fungibility can contribute to the effects we find, especially if it influences purchases of alcohol or drugs, which are correlates of domestic violence.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Older children increase reliance on school meals toward the end of the SNAP cycle but choose nonsubsidized options earlier in the SNAP month. That said, whether this behavior results in decreases in healthy eating or declines in nutritional intake remains a question for future work, as suggested by Cotti et al (2018) which shows lower academic performance at the end of the SNAP cycle.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While current research shows that household food purchases and consumption of certain goods decrease at the end of the SNAP month, evidence of the effects of SNAP benefit exhaustion on child food consumption is limited. Most research focused on children examines the effect of the timing of SNAP payments on health and school outcomes such as test scores (Cotti, Gordanier, and Ozturk 2018;Gassman-Pines and Bellows 2018) and student discipline (Gennetian et al 2016).…”
Section: Snap and Food Consumptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, other studies have shown notable changes in student academic success based on social ties, namely ties with both the family and school (Stubbs & Maynard, 2017). These indings highlight that students who experienced challenges in the family are at greater risk of maintaining academic engagement and success, which is often tied to emotional problems (Cotti, Gordanier, & Ozturk, 2018;Dzever, 2015). Although previous research provides consistent evidence that positive family functioning is an important correlate and possibly predictor of academic performance, the mutual or reciprocal links between family functioning and school engagement has not been directly established, and therefore, calls for additional research.…”
Section: Family Functioning and School Engagementmentioning
confidence: 96%