2014
DOI: 10.1111/ajps.12134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Do the Rich Vote Less Than the Poor and Why? Explaining Turnout Inequality across the World

Abstract: The conventional wisdom that the poor are less likely to vote than the rich is based upon research on voting behavior in advanced industrialized countries. However, in some places, the relationship between turnout and socioeconomic status is reversed. We argue that the potential tax exposure of the rich explains the positive relationship between income and voting in some places and not others. Where the rich anticipate taxation, they have a greater incentive to participate in politics, and politicians are more… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
57
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…That parties are often organized on ethnic or geographic basisrather than by class or religion-further contributes to the non-programmatic nature of almost all political parties, in Africa and beyond (Riedl, 2014). Although voting rates among the poor are sometimes higher (Kasara and Suryanarayan, 2014) this may reflect differences in mobilization (or the repression of mobilization efforts) in different contexts and does not extend immediately to other types of engagement.…”
Section: Access As a Constraint On Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That parties are often organized on ethnic or geographic basisrather than by class or religion-further contributes to the non-programmatic nature of almost all political parties, in Africa and beyond (Riedl, 2014). Although voting rates among the poor are sometimes higher (Kasara and Suryanarayan, 2014) this may reflect differences in mobilization (or the repression of mobilization efforts) in different contexts and does not extend immediately to other types of engagement.…”
Section: Access As a Constraint On Political Communicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the fundamental objectives of democracy is to ensure that public policy responds to citizens' needs. A large literature has demonstrated, however, that there exist significant differences in civic engagement across politically relevant, sociodemographic divides: Low income earners, the less educated, the less urban, the young, and those belonging to ethnic minorities have a significantly lower propensity to vote (Armingeon and Schädel ; Kasara and Suryanarayan ; Mueller and Stratmann ; Nevitte et al. ; Verba, Schlozman, and Brady ) .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Those who are more economically engaged likely also face greater opportunity costs -they hold higher valuations of their time. Electoral participation in the early 2000s was typically declining in income in South Africa (Everatt, 2016), and the same relationship has been found in 9 other African democracies (Kuenzi and Lambright, 2011) and across many other parts of the developing world (Kasara and Suryanarayan, 2015).…”
Section: Models Of Turnout Behaviormentioning
confidence: 61%