2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvb.2019.103342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When do low-initiative employees feel responsible for change and speak up to managers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 78 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…transformational leadership, McCormick et al, 2019) and organizational climate (e.g. psychological safety in workgroup, Starzyk and Sonnentag, 2019) as important moderators. Past research, however, has mainly focused on the moderating effects of perceptions of work environment (Du et al, 2021;Li et al, 2010;McCormick et al, 2019;Starzyk and Sonnentag, 2019), with little attention paid to the roles of relational variables as critical contingencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…transformational leadership, McCormick et al, 2019) and organizational climate (e.g. psychological safety in workgroup, Starzyk and Sonnentag, 2019) as important moderators. Past research, however, has mainly focused on the moderating effects of perceptions of work environment (Du et al, 2021;Li et al, 2010;McCormick et al, 2019;Starzyk and Sonnentag, 2019), with little attention paid to the roles of relational variables as critical contingencies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…psychological safety in workgroup, Starzyk and Sonnentag, 2019) as important moderators. Past research, however, has mainly focused on the moderating effects of perceptions of work environment (Du et al, 2021;Li et al, 2010;McCormick et al, 2019;Starzyk and Sonnentag, 2019), with little attention paid to the roles of relational variables as critical contingencies. In this paper, we aim to explore two related but distinct relational moderators, trust in leaders and felt trust by leaders, of the proactive personality-to-voice behaviour relationship.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, Fuller et al (2006) demonstrated that access to knowledge and skills was positively related to responsibility for change, and employees with great responsibility tend to exhibit more initiative behaviors (Graham, 1986). Other literature proposed that employees with high responsibility for change displayed more voice (Arain et al, 2019;Starzyk and Sonnentag, 2019) and continuous improvement (Fuller et al, 2006). A prominent HRM model that has been used is the ability, motivation and opportunity model (Allen et al, 2003;Edgar and Geare, 2005), which posits that employees will perform when they have the ability and competencies to do so.…”
Section: Mediating Role Of Responsibility For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The contribution of an employee who avoids doing more than what is expected from her or him and the one who seeks ways to do her or his job more effectively and takes responsibility instead of waiting for help when s/he encounters a problem, would be different for the benefit of the organization (Starzyk & Sonnentag, 2019). The concept of initiative taking behaviour, which was first introduced for employees of profit-oriented organizations, was used in research on many different occupational groups and fields of work (Redfern, Coster, Ewans, & Dewe, 2010).…”
Section: Taking Initiative At School Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%