2016
DOI: 10.2298/psi1604447s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When disruptive behavior meets outcome-based education

Abstract: Disruptive behavior is a major concern for most educational systems. Schools often respond to disruptive students with exclusionary and punitive approaches that have limited effect or value. Moreover, recent neoliberal trends with increased focus on student learning outcome change the attitudes towards disruptive student behavior and also narrow down and homogenize the range of what is considered as "acceptable student behavior". In this article we discuss the interrelationship between an outcome-based, neolib… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
12
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, numerous studies have suggested that procrastination affects academic performance when students delay working on their assignments until the last minutes (Ferrari, 2001;Steel, 2007;Tice & Bratslavsky, 2000). It can be seen as a disruptive behaviour to education (Szulevicz, Mai, Marsico, & Vaalsiner, 2016), especially when pupils use social networking sites (SNS) to communicate in groups putting pressures on others and distracting them. Instead of studying, students might engage in different activities, such as watching TV and playing electronic games (Klassen & Kuzucu, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, numerous studies have suggested that procrastination affects academic performance when students delay working on their assignments until the last minutes (Ferrari, 2001;Steel, 2007;Tice & Bratslavsky, 2000). It can be seen as a disruptive behaviour to education (Szulevicz, Mai, Marsico, & Vaalsiner, 2016), especially when pupils use social networking sites (SNS) to communicate in groups putting pressures on others and distracting them. Instead of studying, students might engage in different activities, such as watching TV and playing electronic games (Klassen & Kuzucu, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, the activity of individualsunderstood in terms of actions, thoughts, beliefs, motivations, and reasoning-is influenced by the interweaving of explicit and implicit knowledge. They are the result of latent, informal learning that occurs through experience in everyday life contexts, within certain cultural frames (Perret-Clermont, 1979;Perret and Perret-Clermont, 2011) or socially and emotionally safe thinking spaces (Bachtin, 1981;Perret-Clermont, 2001Zittoun and Iannaccone, 2014;Coppola et al, 2015Coppola et al, , 2019Szulevicz et al, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can barely provide the means to overcome a standardized and common sense modality of understanding reality. The tendency is rather to turn higher education into a military, religious or factory-like system educational setting, where the adherence to certain credo, standard or set of rules is more valued than any exploration of new possible worlds (Marsico, 2015;Szulevicz et al, 2016;Mbembe, 2016).…”
Section: Who Can Create New Knowledge?mentioning
confidence: 99%