2016
DOI: 10.1017/rdc.2016.52
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Dental Enamel is Put to the Acid Test: Pretreatment Effects and Radiocarbon Dating

Abstract: The influence of hydrochloric acid pretreatment on F14C and radiocarbon dates from dental enamel was investigated. Samples from modern equine incisors, a Roman cattle molar, and a Paleolithic woolly rhino molar were sampled and subsequently divided into five fractions. Each fraction was pretreated with a different acid solution, analyzed with Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), and accelerator mass spectrometry (AMS) 14C dated at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). When compared to a co… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Chemical pretreatment was done as described in ref. 42 to remove labile carbonates on crystal surfaces and grain boundaries. While the procedure is still far from being standardized, it is thought to provide a reliable terminus ante quem ( SI Appendix , section 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chemical pretreatment was done as described in ref. 42 to remove labile carbonates on crystal surfaces and grain boundaries. While the procedure is still far from being standardized, it is thought to provide a reliable terminus ante quem ( SI Appendix , section 3 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For bone and teeth samples, dating of collagen/dentin was preferred over bioapatite or mixed material. The reliability of bioapatite dating depends heavily on age and burial environment, and often provides dates that are too young (Hopkins et al 2016;Zazzo et al 2012;Zazzo and Saliège 2011). Both exogenous and endogenous carbon are present as carbonates (CO 3 ).…”
Section: Date Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two published measurements on individuals CA-00-01 (Wk-26795) and CA-00-02 (Wk-26794) were excluded from the model because were measured on dental enamel (Table S1.2). Despite improving methods, dating and calibrating measurements on enamel is problematic (Hedges et al 1995;Hopkins et al 2016). Fortunately, both skeletons were also collagen dated (TO-10217 and TO-10216).…”
Section: Cabeço Da Arrudamentioning
confidence: 99%