When Criminals Abuse the Blockchain: Establishing Personal Jurisdiction in a Decentralised Environment

Abstract

In August of 2022, the United States Department of Treasury sanctioned the virtual currency mixer Tornado Cash, an open-source and fully decentralised piece of software running on the Ethereum blockchain, subsequently leading to the arrest of one of its developers in The Netherlands. Not only was this the first time the Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) extended its authority to sanction a foreign ‘person’ to software, but the decentralised nature of the software and global usage highlight the challenge of establishing jurisdiction over decentralised software and its global user base. The government claims jurisdiction over citizens, residents, and any assets that pass through the country’s territory. As a global financial center with most large tech companies, this often facilitates the establishment of jurisdiction over global conduct that passes through US servers. However, decentralised programs on blockchains with nodes located around the world challenge this traditional approach as either nearly all countries can claim jurisdiction over users, subjecting users to criminal laws in countries with which they have no true interaction, or they limit jurisdiction, thereby risking abuse by bad actors. This article takes a comparative approach to examine the challenges to establishing criminal jurisdiction on cryptocurrency-related crimes.

Price Delay and Market Efficiency of Cryptocurrencies: The Impact of Liquidity and Volatility during the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…Cryptocurrencies have also witnessed a rise in their use for illicit practices (Albrecht et al 2019). This phenomenon is driven by the decentralized structure of blockchain technology, which presents hurdles in determining territorial jurisdiction in cases of transnational crimes (Watters 2023). Policymakers are thus interested in overseeing cryptocurrency usage and mitigating its exploitation.…”

Universal skepticism of ChatGPT: a review of early literature on chat generative pre-trained transformer

“…The early research on ChatGPT suggests a range of potential benefits and drawbacks across various fields such as healthcare, business, psychology, and computer science, among others. Like the beginnings of the internet or the creation of digital assets (Lawuobahsumo et al, 2022 ; Kapengut and Mizrach, 2023 ; Watters, 2023 ), ChatGPT and its underlying technology have the opportunity for both positive and negative disruption. While many scholars have raised concerns about the impact of ChatGPT on employment opportunities in different industries, there are also significant ethical considerations to be addressed before widespread implementation can occur.…”

Cryptocurrencies, Tax Ignorance and Tax Noncompliance in Direct Taxation: Spanish Empirical Evidence

“…The uses of cryptocurrencies are not always legitimate, and despite the apparent security they offer, fraudulent use exists. This has led to the adaptation of legislation (Teichmann and Falker 2020;Issah et al 2022;Watters 2023;Lucero and Muslera 2022). This type of asset faces an additional difficulty because, in addition to being a means of payment, it can represent any good that its creators have intended it to symbolize.…”