2019
DOI: 10.1002/bse.2398
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When companies improve the sustainability of the natural environment: A study of large U.S. companies

Abstract: In light of the call for companies to abandon current approaches to environmental management, this study adds to the environmental strategy literature and uses the evidence of competitive dynamics among companies to identify a mechanism by which companies invest in proactive environmental strategies and thereby improve the sustainability of the natural environment. An examination utilizing fixed effects regressions on a sample of large U.S.‐based companies reveal that even after controlling the number, environ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, Moura‐Leite, Padgett, and Galán (2014) have posited that due to limited resources and increased demands for social welfare, businesses should be concerned with issues such as environmental damage, product safety and human resource management. Further, there has always been an argument that there are differences between companies' attitudes to environmental and social concerns (De Mendonca & Zhou, 2019). Against this background, arguments on sustainability practices have always focused on large corporations whose impacts are highly significant (Lawrence, Collins, Pavlovich, & Arunachalam, 2006; Simpson, Taylor, & Barker, 2004; Studer, Tsang, Welford, & Hills, 2008; Rutherfoord et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Moura‐Leite, Padgett, and Galán (2014) have posited that due to limited resources and increased demands for social welfare, businesses should be concerned with issues such as environmental damage, product safety and human resource management. Further, there has always been an argument that there are differences between companies' attitudes to environmental and social concerns (De Mendonca & Zhou, 2019). Against this background, arguments on sustainability practices have always focused on large corporations whose impacts are highly significant (Lawrence, Collins, Pavlovich, & Arunachalam, 2006; Simpson, Taylor, & Barker, 2004; Studer, Tsang, Welford, & Hills, 2008; Rutherfoord et al, 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following Rogers' theory on the diffusion of innovation (Rogers, 1962), sustainability leaders could be seen as innovators in a general industry transition towards sustainability. By acting more sustainably, these actors can induce ‘laggards’ to enact higher sustainability ambitions (De Mendonca & Zhou, 2020), facilitating sector mainstreaming. However, these companies could also use sustainability to differentiate themselves from mainstream competitors, appealing to sustainability‐conscious stakeholders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, firms with proactive environmental strategies should be able to gain the innovation. At market level, firms with proactive environmental strategies are associated with first mover advantage [4]. Moreover, they concluded that sustainable development of the firms is linked with proactive environmental strategies.…”
Section: Proactive Environmental Strategies and Green Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence, these environmental problems generate the need to investigate the industrial sector in the context of environmental practices. Prior literature on environmental practices provided reasons to motivate firms to seek proactive environmental strategies [4]. Moreover, currently, the sustainable environment is very important for firms because it enhances the shareholders' confidence, as well [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%