Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.02.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When co-production fails: The role of customer’s internal attributions and impression management concerns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
5
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Service providers integrate customer resources (e.g. effort, skills and knowledge) into their own value chain, making customers active participants in service providers’ “work” (Sugathan and Ranjan, 2020). An example is when hotel customers are tasked with making reservations, checking in and checking out, where customers perform workloads that the organization previously performed.…”
Section: The Complex Nature Of Consumption Journeysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service providers integrate customer resources (e.g. effort, skills and knowledge) into their own value chain, making customers active participants in service providers’ “work” (Sugathan and Ranjan, 2020). An example is when hotel customers are tasked with making reservations, checking in and checking out, where customers perform workloads that the organization previously performed.…”
Section: The Complex Nature Of Consumption Journeysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Co-production consists of multi-actor physical and mental activities involving a mutual exchange of operant resources (e.g. effort, time, skills and knowledge) to create products and services (Sugathan and Ranjan, 2020). As such, co-production involves several stakeholders (customers, drivers and the brand) who integrate their resources and interact through purposefully-designed mobile platforms (Ramaswamy and Ozcan, 2016).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework and Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the absence of shared actors or relationship structure, however, consumers are unable to assign SF responsibility to the recovering firm. Rather, consumers are limited to attributing failure to external factors like the nature of the failed task, or to internal factors (which necessitates taking responsibility for failure upon themselves; Sugathan and Ranjan 2020). While consumers are generally averse to taking responsibility for negative outcomes (per the self-serving bias; Folkes 1988), research on co-produced SFs suggests consumers sometimes attribute co-produced SFs internally—attributions that generate feelings of guilt (Heidenreich et al 2015) and regret (Pacheco, Becker, and Brei 2017).…”
Section: Conceptual Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%