2017
DOI: 10.1137/15m1040852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Can Splits be Drawn in the Plane?

Abstract: Split networks are a popular tool for the analysis and visualization of complex evolutionary histories. Every collection of splits (bipartitions) of a finite set can be represented by a split network. Here we characterize which collection of splits can be represented using a planar split network. Our main theorem links these collections of splits with oriented matroids and arrangements of lines separating points in the plane. As a consequence of our main theorem, we establish a particularly simple characteriza… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To prove Proposition 1 we shall also use [21,Theorem 15] which states that a maximum linearly independent split system S on a set X with n ≥ 2 elements is a maximum flat split system if and only if, for every 4-element subset Y ⊆ X, the restriction S| Y contains precisely 6 splits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To prove Proposition 1 we shall also use [21,Theorem 15] which states that a maximum linearly independent split system S on a set X with n ≥ 2 elements is a maximum flat split system if and only if, for every 4-element subset Y ⊆ X, the restriction S| Y contains precisely 6 splits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence M = {a, b, c, d} ∪ {u, u , v, v } is a 6-element subset such that S D| M is not compatible. [21], the lemma can be proven using graph-theoretical concepts from [22]. In the following we provide a direct proof for completeness.…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…X. Note that the splits in S D are precisely those appearing in the index set of the first sum in Equation (1). We chose the name for S D since it is closely related to the midpath phylogeny introduced in [20].…”
Section: The Midpath Split System Of a Distancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, in Section 3, we prove a variant of Bonnot et al's result for arbitrary q ≥ p 2 > 0 in the special case where the split system underlying a tree is maximal (Theorem 1). In Section 4 we focus on the split system associated to a distance D on X that forms the index set for the first sum in Equation (1). In particular, we give a tight upper bound on its size (Theorem 2), and also a characterization for when it is compatible (Theorem 3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%