2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2008.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When can glycopeptides be assigned based solely on high-resolution mass spectrometry data?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mass Spectrometric Fragmentation Methods-Although choosing a separation strategy that maximizes the MS detection of glycopeptides is a key step in the success of glycopeptide analysis, detecting the m/z values of the glycoforms is typically not sufficient for high confidence analysis (34). Fragmentation data on the glycoforms should be used to support the assignments.…”
Section: Emerging Methods Supporting Glycopeptide Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mass Spectrometric Fragmentation Methods-Although choosing a separation strategy that maximizes the MS detection of glycopeptides is a key step in the success of glycopeptide analysis, detecting the m/z values of the glycoforms is typically not sufficient for high confidence analysis (34). Fragmentation data on the glycoforms should be used to support the assignments.…”
Section: Emerging Methods Supporting Glycopeptide Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, both MS and MS/MS data are required to provide a high confidence assignment for any glycopeptide composition (34). Unfortunately, only a few tools are currently available to the public that make use of both types of data in one package.…”
Section: Emerging Methods Supporting Glycopeptide Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In undertaking these steps, one approach-utilized by the GlycoMod tool [37] -involves matching theoretical glycopeptide masses, generated for base peptides associated with proteins identified in the sample, against those obtained experimentally. The simplicity of this technique is offset by its potential for high false discovery rates, even when high mass accuracy data is utilized [38]; MS/MS product ion scans are therefore often required to achieve adequate confirmation of glycopeptide matches. During step 2a this can be achieved using specific instrumentation [32,33,39,40] or fragmentation methods [5,[41][42][43][44][45][46]; of particular note is the use of the often intensive peptide+HexNAc (Y1) ion in CID derived MS/MS spectra [47], which can support the identification of base peptide masses [48].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A typical analysis employs a bottom-up proteomics approach wherein glycoproteins are enzymatically digested using a specific or nonspecific protease to generate the peptide/glycopeptide mixture that is subsequently analyzed by a mass spectrometry (MS) platform in tandem with the chromatographic separation of choice (2,11,14,18,29,48,51,66). Following data acquisition, all possible glycopeptides are identified by peaks that are separated by monosaccharide units and/or by peaks of characteristic glycopeptide-marker ions in the MS 1 and tandem-MS (MS/MS) data (9,21,66).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%