2022
DOI: 10.1017/bca.2022.22
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When Can Benefit–Cost Analyses Ignore Secondary Markets?

Abstract: We make four main contributions in this paper related to the theory and practice of benefit–cost analysis (BCA). First, we show that most BCAs of policy interventions do not consider the welfare consequences in secondary markets, where goods or services can be complements or substitutes to those in the directly regulated markets. Second, we provide a general theoretical analysis for examining the sign of welfare effects in secondary markets, showing how the results depend on the welfare measure of interest and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 39 publications
(84 reference statements)
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The costs and benefits associated with each proposed scenario were quantified in monetary terms using the formula employed by Miranda et al (2012), Dahlui et al (2021), and Kotchen & Levinson (2023), which is represented by Equation 9.…”
Section: Epidemiological Scenario (Hlb Without Pnf)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs and benefits associated with each proposed scenario were quantified in monetary terms using the formula employed by Miranda et al (2012), Dahlui et al (2021), and Kotchen & Levinson (2023), which is represented by Equation 9.…”
Section: Epidemiological Scenario (Hlb Without Pnf)mentioning
confidence: 99%