When Brokerage Between Friendship Cliques Endangers Trust: A Personality–Network Fit Perspective

Relationally Charged: How and When Workplace Friendship Facilitates Employee Interpersonal Citizenship

“…Third, recent research has begun to study workplace friendship using a social network approach (Methot et al, 2016;Hood et al, 2017;Tasselli and Kilduff, 2018). This approach highlights that an individual is "in the thick of things, " and that interpersonal relationships are more dynamic in nature (Methot et al, 2016).…”

Personality Change: Implications for Organizational Behavior

“…While acknowledging the relevance of situational pressures, researchers have demonstrated the importance of relatively fixed traits in predicting a range of outcomes of interest to organizational behavior that include performance motivation (see Judge & Ilies, 2002, for a meta-analysis) and leadership (see Judge, Bono, Ilies, & Gerhardt, 2002, for a meta-analysis). The situation in which the individual is embedded and the personality resources that the individual brings to bear on the situation are both now recognized as contributing to outcomes (e.g., Tasselli & Kilduff, 2017). For example, recent research showed that Big Five personality traits were stronger predictors of job performance for jobs that were weakly constrained by situational pressures (e.g., jobs that were unstructured, and jobs in which employees had discretion to make decisions) relative to jobs that were strongly constrained (Judge & Zapata, 2015).…”

“…There is debate concerning whether an employee who belongs to two or more cohesive cliques faces highly constraining pressures (Krackhardt, 1999), or whether the cross-pressures from being a "multiple insider" who brokers across cliques frees the individual to enhance innovation by transferring ideas between otherwise disconnected individuals (Vedres & Stark, 2010). New research suggests that different personality types are differentially trusted to play this multiple insider role (Tasselli & Kilduff, 2017). What is unclear is whether these kinds of vital informal brokerage tasks change personality, and whether, conversely, being embedded in a single clique protects the individual from pressures to change personality.…”

The Role of Trust in Sustainable Heritage Management Networks. Case Study of Selected Cultural Routes in Poland

“…In the recent period, research into issues related to networks and trust has focused on the following: trust in governance network [76], gender-based differences in risky environments [77], the significance of the various dimensions of trust (abilities, kindliness, integrity, and predictability) in the particular phases of the trust building process [78], the significance of the various dimensions of trust in developing and managing interpersonal trust [79], the significance of network infrastructure in information markets and products [80], trust and reliability in Online Social Networks [81], the importance of the kinds of actors in building trust in networks that are created in the public sector [82], relations between the level of social support experienced by network members and the level of trust available to network members with respect to one another and with respect to the network as a whole [83], the influence of trust and social networks on wellbeing-in the relationship between social capital and income [84], the level of trust in cliques [85], expectations regarding reliability [86], the role of trust in interactions in complex social systems [87], the significance of a network of trust in career progression [88], the significance of trust in e-commerce services [89], the uses of social media in the process of managing and building trust [90], the significance of the independent thought and readiness for change in creating informal social networks [91], and the role of network openness and social capital in the information sharing process [92].…”