2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.16756.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When are extremely metal-deficient galaxies extremely metal deficient?

Abstract: Extremely metal‐deficient (XMD) galaxies, by definition, have oxygen abundances ≤1/10 solar, and form a very small fraction of the local gas‐rich, star‐forming dwarf galaxy population. We examine their positions in the luminosity–metallicity (L–Z) and mass–metallicity (M–Z) planes, with respect to the L–Z and M–Z relations of other gas‐rich, star‐forming dwarf galaxies, viz., blue compact galaxies (BCGs) and dwarf irregular (dI) galaxies. We find that while the metallicities of some low‐luminosity XMD galaxies… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
59
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
11
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the subset of 149 EELGs with reliable metallicities we find six objects (∼4%) with metallicities below the limit for XMPs (∼1/10 Z , e.g., Kniazev et al 2004;Ekta & Chengalur 2010). We show two examples in Fig.…”
Section: Discovery Of Extremely Metal-poor Eelgsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In the subset of 149 EELGs with reliable metallicities we find six objects (∼4%) with metallicities below the limit for XMPs (∼1/10 Z , e.g., Kniazev et al 2004;Ekta & Chengalur 2010). We show two examples in Fig.…”
Section: Discovery Of Extremely Metal-poor Eelgsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Many XMD galaxies are interacting systems (Ekta et al 2008). Ekta & Chengalur (2010) proposed an alternative hypothesis that XMD galaxies deviate from the L-Z and M * -Z relations because of a combination of having low effective chemical yields and higher gas fractions due to tidal interactions. Presently, XMDs are characterised by very high specific star formation rates (sSFR) of 10-100 Gyr −1 .…”
Section: Mass-metallicity Relationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…But how the luminosity is representative of stellar mass depends on the frequency band one investigates. Traditionally, the L − Z relation is studied at optical wavelengths (e.g., Lequeux et al 1979;Skillman et al 1989Skillman et al , 1997Pilyugin 2001;Garnett 2002;Lee et al 2003a,b;Pilyugin et al 2004;van Zee & Haynes 2006;Ekta & Chengalur 2010). The optical luminosity could be affected by the current SF process, therefore more and more effort is put into determining the near-infrared L − Z (hence M * − Z) relation where the dominant emission arises from the older stellar populations (e.g., Pérez-González et al 2003;Lee et al 2004;Salzer et al 2005;Lee et al 2006;Mendes de Oliveira et al 2006;Rosenberg et al 2006;Vaduvescu et al 2007;Saviane et al 2008).…”
Section: Luminosity-metallicity (L -Z) Relation and Mass-metallicity mentioning
confidence: 99%