1982
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(82)90035-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When are electron microscopy, histoculture, and other procedures useful in the clinical evaluation of lung cancer?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1985
1985
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current classification of pulmonary' neoplasms may need to be modified in the near future to incorpo rate the newly created data [70][71][72]. At the present time, there appears to be, at least, a need for a 'double standard', as Sobin [73] has suggested, which would permit the evaluation of the biologic significance of the ultrastructural and immunocytochemical findings (as applied to classification of neoplasms) in an effort to derive meaningful clinicopathologic correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current classification of pulmonary' neoplasms may need to be modified in the near future to incorpo rate the newly created data [70][71][72]. At the present time, there appears to be, at least, a need for a 'double standard', as Sobin [73] has suggested, which would permit the evaluation of the biologic significance of the ultrastructural and immunocytochemical findings (as applied to classification of neoplasms) in an effort to derive meaningful clinicopathologic correlations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%