2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11142-018-9445-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When and why do IPO firms manage earnings?

Abstract: There is significant disagreement about whether, when, and why IPO firms manage earnings. We precisely identify the timing and motives behind earnings management by IPO firms. The period around an IPO is characterized by two events: the IPO itself and the lockup expiration. Both the raising of capital at the IPO and the exit by pre-IPO shareholders at lockup expiration create incentives for firms to manage earnings. To disentangle the effect of these events, we examine quarterly, rather than annual, abnormal a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(106 reference statements)
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, this study sheds light on the debate about earnings management around IPO (e.g., Darrough and Rangan 2005;Katz 2009;Cecchini et al 2012;Wongsunwai 2013;Armstrong et al 2016;Fedyk et al 2017;Sletten et al 2018). While prior literature has consensus that IPO firms have higher discretionary accruals at the year of IPO, there is mixed evidence whether they have abnormally high discretionary accruals before IPO (Ball and Shivakumar 2008;Venkataraman et al 2008;Sletten et al 2018). We fill this gap in the literature by providing empirical evidence about the likelihood of restatements of pre-IPO financials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…More specifically, this study sheds light on the debate about earnings management around IPO (e.g., Darrough and Rangan 2005;Katz 2009;Cecchini et al 2012;Wongsunwai 2013;Armstrong et al 2016;Fedyk et al 2017;Sletten et al 2018). While prior literature has consensus that IPO firms have higher discretionary accruals at the year of IPO, there is mixed evidence whether they have abnormally high discretionary accruals before IPO (Ball and Shivakumar 2008;Venkataraman et al 2008;Sletten et al 2018). We fill this gap in the literature by providing empirical evidence about the likelihood of restatements of pre-IPO financials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Prior accounting literature suggests that substantial earnings management occurs before IPO (Aharony et al 1993;Friedlan 1994;Teoh et al 1998a;Teoh et al 1998b;Morsfield and Tan 2006;Wongsunwai 2013;Sletten et al 2018). The incentive to overstate earnings is greater for managers of IPO firms because higher reported earnings help them have a successful debut in the public equity market.…”
Section: Prior Literature and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additionally, they show that public companies have enhanced accounting quality due to the market and regulatory effects on the financial reporting of these firms. More recently, Sletten et al (2018) examine the timing and motivations more closely using quarterly data. They find that the earnings management only happens in the quarter before and the quarter of the lockup expiration.…”
Section: Accounting Role In Financing Decisionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ascioglu, Hegde, Krishnan, and Mcdermott (2012) show that the use of such practices is influenced by the firms' liquidity. Sletten, Ertimur, Sunder, and Weber (2018) argue that a rise of capital at the initial public offering and the large-scale exit, by pre-initial public offering shareholders at lockup expiration which is calculated to approximately 180 days later, create incentives for firms to manage earnings. According to Miloud (2013), when the aim of earnings management is to increase the attractiveness of the offered shares, it needs to go undetected by market participants.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%