2002
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer.

Abstract: Despite a century's worth of research, arguments surrounding the question of whether far transfer occurs have made little progress toward resolution. The authors argue the reason for this confusion is a failure to specify various dimensions along which transfer can occur, resulting in comparisons of "apples and oranges." They provide a framework that describes 9 relevant dimensions and show that the literature can productively be classified along these dimensions, with each study situated at the intersection o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
1,168
5
48

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,476 publications
(1,245 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
19
1,168
5
48
Order By: Relevance
“…More specifically, in this view, working memory training would be expected to show both near-and far-transfer effects (see Barnett & Ceci, 2002). Near-transfer effects are effects on tasks close to those trained (e.g., improvements on a visuospatial working memory task following training on a verbal working memory task), whereas far-transfer effects are effects on tasks quite different from those trained (e.g., improvements on IQ tests following training on working memory tasks).…”
Section: Training Working Memory Capacity: Theoretical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, in this view, working memory training would be expected to show both near-and far-transfer effects (see Barnett & Ceci, 2002). Near-transfer effects are effects on tasks close to those trained (e.g., improvements on a visuospatial working memory task following training on a verbal working memory task), whereas far-transfer effects are effects on tasks quite different from those trained (e.g., improvements on IQ tests following training on working memory tasks).…”
Section: Training Working Memory Capacity: Theoretical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Baltes & Lindenberger, 1988;Lövdén et al, 2010). One way to answer this question is to try to determine and evaluate the distance of transfer tasks (Barnett & Ceci, 2002;Noack et al, 2009;Zelinski, 2009;cf. Baltes, Dittmann-Kohli, & Kliegl, 1986).…”
Section: Generality Of Transfermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Verhaeghen [22] recommends training that involves "broader skills rather than specific techniques, at the same time focusing on the applicability of these skills in different contexts" (p. 17). Similar recommendations come from the literature on transfer [23], such as that transfer can be facilitated by training people in metacognitive awareness [24]. Based on these recommendations, our approach focuses on broader applicability of trained strategies by building transfer into the skill training itself, and as a consequence, older adults may be more likely to understand that these skills should be applied to a variety of materials across many contexts.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%