2010
DOI: 10.3949/ccjm.77a.09064
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When and how to evaluate mildly elevated liver enzymes in apparently healthy patients

Abstract: Because 1% to 9% of people without symptoms have elevated liver enzymes, extensive evaluation of all abnormal test results would expose many patients to undue risks and expenses. On the other hand, failure to evaluate minor liver enzyme elevations could mean missing the early diagnosis of potentially treatable disorders. This review discusses likely causes of elevated aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and gamma-glutamyl transferase levels and provides algorithms for evaluating high liver enzyme values in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
96
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
96
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two analysis models were run for continuous intake per serving of soft drinks and juices: (1) conditioned on the matching factors only and adjusted for non-alcoholic energy intake (crude model) and (2) multivariable adjustment for the same confounders as described for the cohort analyses. Because liver function may be altered in liver disease [30], the analyses per serving a week were also adjusted for liver function score (score: 0-6), based on the abnormal levels of liver function test (laboratory cutoffs: ALT > 55 U/L, AST > 34 U/L, GGT > 64 UL-men and > 36 U/L-women, AP > 150 U/L, albumin < 35 g/L, total bilirubin > 20.5 µmol/L). Interaction between soft g Sex-specific categories: light drinker (women: 0-3 g/day, men: 0-6 g/day); heavy drinker (women ≥30 g/day, men ≥60 g/day) drinks and juices intake and liver function score categories (no damage 0, possible damage 1-6), as well as BMI categories (BMI: <25 kg/m 2 normal weight, ≥25-30 kg/ m 2 overweight, ≥30 kg/m 2 obese) was also studied.…”
Section: Nested Case-control Subsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two analysis models were run for continuous intake per serving of soft drinks and juices: (1) conditioned on the matching factors only and adjusted for non-alcoholic energy intake (crude model) and (2) multivariable adjustment for the same confounders as described for the cohort analyses. Because liver function may be altered in liver disease [30], the analyses per serving a week were also adjusted for liver function score (score: 0-6), based on the abnormal levels of liver function test (laboratory cutoffs: ALT > 55 U/L, AST > 34 U/L, GGT > 64 UL-men and > 36 U/L-women, AP > 150 U/L, albumin < 35 g/L, total bilirubin > 20.5 µmol/L). Interaction between soft g Sex-specific categories: light drinker (women: 0-3 g/day, men: 0-6 g/day); heavy drinker (women ≥30 g/day, men ≥60 g/day) drinks and juices intake and liver function score categories (no damage 0, possible damage 1-6), as well as BMI categories (BMI: <25 kg/m 2 normal weight, ≥25-30 kg/ m 2 overweight, ≥30 kg/m 2 obese) was also studied.…”
Section: Nested Case-control Subsetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The serum activity of these enzymes is routinely measured for the detection of liver disorders (19). The liver cells release these enzymes into the blood stream following injury or death.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As per literature, false positive results are more prevalent in identifying alcohol abuse because coffee consumption can also reduce the percent of alcohol biomarkers (ALT/AST) [3]. Also diabetes can elevate the %CDT in the blood [4].Themeasures to overcome false positive is not discussed in the study.…”
mentioning
confidence: 96%