2011
DOI: 10.1088/2041-8205/727/2/l40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When a Standard Candle Flickers

Abstract: The Crab Nebula is the only hard X-ray source in the sky that is both bright enough and steady enough to be easily used as a standard candle. As a result, it has been used as a normalization standard by most X-ray/gamma-ray telescopes. Although small-scale variations in the nebula are well known, since the start of science operations of

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

18
111
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
18
111
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fitting the Crab orbital light curve with a constant, a σ sys,A = 0.06 × F systematic error needs to be added to obtain a reduced χ 2 equal to 1. A further source of uncertainty is expected following the finding of longterm variability in the Crab light curve (up to ∼7% on a year time scale; Wilson-Hodge et al 2011); therefore, the value of the sys A term is likely to be overestimated here. Owing to the difficulty of disentangling the systematic component from the intrinsic Crab variability, we prefer to choose a conservative approach and to adopt the sys A = 0.06 value.…”
Section: Light Curve Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Fitting the Crab orbital light curve with a constant, a σ sys,A = 0.06 × F systematic error needs to be added to obtain a reduced χ 2 equal to 1. A further source of uncertainty is expected following the finding of longterm variability in the Crab light curve (up to ∼7% on a year time scale; Wilson-Hodge et al 2011); therefore, the value of the sys A term is likely to be overestimated here. Owing to the difficulty of disentangling the systematic component from the intrinsic Crab variability, we prefer to choose a conservative approach and to adopt the sys A = 0.06 value.…”
Section: Light Curve Systematic Errorsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Consequently, the lack of information about the site of the flare in the PWN has led to a variety of models being suggested (see § 3). Given the lack of contemporaneous variability at lower frequencies, it might be possible that some of the energy released during the process associated with the γ-ray flares will manifest itself as more gradual flux changes at lower frequencies 4 occurring on much longer timescales (e.g., hard X-ray variability reported by Kouzu et al 2013;Wilson-Hodge et al 2011).…”
Section: Multiwavelength Properties Of the Crabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Meyer et al 2010), its emission shows substantial variability at high energies (HE; E > 100 MeV) (see e.g. Tavani et al 2011;Abdo et al 2011;Striani et al 2011Striani et al , 2013bBuehler et al 2012), as well as at X-ray energies (Wilson-Hodge et al 2011), albeit with a smaller relative amplitude of flux changes (≈5%) and on longer time scales of a few months. The most recent example is the flare detected with Fermi-LAT (Ojha et al 2013;Mayer et al 2013) and AGILE (Striani et al 2013a;Verrecchia et al 2013) in March 2013, when the peak photon flux of the synchrotron component above 100 MeV was (103.4 ± 0.8) × 10 −7 cm −2 s −1 compared to (6.1 ± 0.1) × 10 −7 cm −2 s −1 in its quiescent state, and variability was measured on time scales of a few hours.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%