Feminisms 1990
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-14428-0_42
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When A “Long” Poem is a “Big” Poem

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally we comment that the results and conclusions reached in the present update hold valid also when the 'deeply bound' states (DBS) in 205 Pb and in 115,119,123 Sn are removed from the large-scale fits of pionic atoms described here. This agrees with earlier conclusions reached by us [3,22,23] where it was shown that the uncertainties in the derived value of b 1 from DBS, or from DBS plus 1s states in light N = Z nuclei, are considerably larger than those derived from large-scale fits (about 0.004 m −1 π , see Figs. 2 and 3).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finally we comment that the results and conclusions reached in the present update hold valid also when the 'deeply bound' states (DBS) in 205 Pb and in 115,119,123 Sn are removed from the large-scale fits of pionic atoms described here. This agrees with earlier conclusions reached by us [3,22,23] where it was shown that the uncertainties in the derived value of b 1 from DBS, or from DBS plus 1s states in light N = Z nuclei, are considerably larger than those derived from large-scale fits (about 0.004 m −1 π , see Figs. 2 and 3).…”
Section: Summary and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…On the other hand, owing to the rather smooth energy dependence of the free-space πN interaction, such tests may not prove sufficiently sensitive to the fine details of the in-medium πN interaction even though they do provide acceptable support for the validity of the algorithm. It is therefore encouraging that the fits to pionic atom data reported here do preserve and even somewhat improve the existing level of agreement with the data, reaffirming earlier conclusions on the in-medium renormalization of the πN interaction [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…(5) figures directly in the pion-nucleus s-wave near-threshold potential. Studies of pionic atoms [27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] and low-energy pion-nucleus scattering [37,38] confirmed that the πN isovector s-wave interaction term is indeed renormalized in agreement with Eq. (5).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%