2010
DOI: 10.1525/abt.2010.72.1.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

When a Fly Has to Fly to Reproduce: Selection against Conditional Recessive Lethals in Drosophila

Abstract: We propose an experimental model suitable for demonstrating allele frequency change in Drosophila melanogaster populations caused by selection against an easily scorable conditional lethal, namely recessive flightless alleles such as apterous and vestigial. Homozygotes for these alleles are excluded from reproduction because the food source used to establish each generation is accessible only by flight. The observed dynamics of flightless-allele frequencies generally follows the theoretically predicted pattern… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If time permits, students could then compete the evolved and ancestral strains in the absence of antibiotic to test for tradeoffs. Using Drosophila, students can, over a semester, observe selection against alleles that are readily scored, such as those that disrupt wing morphology [102]. (Of course, such experiments in classrooms require suitable facilities and appropriately trained teachers, and they must comply with institutional policies and local regulations on biological experiments.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If time permits, students could then compete the evolved and ancestral strains in the absence of antibiotic to test for tradeoffs. Using Drosophila, students can, over a semester, observe selection against alleles that are readily scored, such as those that disrupt wing morphology [102]. (Of course, such experiments in classrooms require suitable facilities and appropriately trained teachers, and they must comply with institutional policies and local regulations on biological experiments.)…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most labs exploring macroevolutionary change have relied on comparisons with living lineages, fossils, or computer simulations (Dubowsky and Hartman 1986;Rodrígues et al Rodríguez et al 2006;Soderberg and Price 2003). While these are valuable teaching materials, inquiry based exercises that utilize living organisms can be more transparent, and offer a direct connection to the ecological theater in which evolutionary processes play out (Delpech 2009;Green et al 2011;Olson and Loucks-Horsley 2000;Plunkett and Yampolsky 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, various studies have shown that virtual labs are adequate for improving understanding of biology topics that are difficult to observe directly in the classroom context (Collier et al, 2012;Pope et al, 2017;Radhamani et al, 2014). For example, evolution by natural selection has been shown to be notoriously difficult for students to understand, and its processes have been described as not directly observable (Krist & Showsh, 2007;Nehm & Schonfeld, 2008;Plunkett & Yampolsky, 2010). However, Pope et al (2017) clearly showed that simulations of natural phenomena are effective tools that support an active teaching approach to help students overcome natural selection misconceptions.…”
Section: Knowledge and Conceptual Understandingmentioning
confidence: 99%