2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ic.2021.104820
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheeler languages

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The (classic) Myhill-Nerode Theorem, among many other things, establishes a bijection between equivalence classes of ≡ L and the states of the minimum DFA recognizing L. This minimum automaton is also unique up to isomorphism and a similar result, fully proved in [2], holds for Wheeler languages as well. In order to state such an analogous of Myhill-Nerode Theorem for Wheeler languages, the equivalence ≡ L is replaced by the equivalence ≡ c L defined below.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The (classic) Myhill-Nerode Theorem, among many other things, establishes a bijection between equivalence classes of ≡ L and the states of the minimum DFA recognizing L. This minimum automaton is also unique up to isomorphism and a similar result, fully proved in [2], holds for Wheeler languages as well. In order to state such an analogous of Myhill-Nerode Theorem for Wheeler languages, the equivalence ≡ L is replaced by the equivalence ≡ c L defined below.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…-The first one consists in identifying some local properties of ≤ D , used to define a general notion of a co-lex (possibly partial) order over the states of an NFA (see [2]). Turning back to DFA's, one can easily prove that ≤ D is the maximum co-lex (partial) order over D. In general, co-lex orders over NFA's can still be used for indexing, with index-construction complexity parametric on the width (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…..f A (a i [d]), then any potential vertex u has an implicit label βS = βB i f A (a i [1])f A (a i [2]). ..f A (a i [d]) [1,3] where β must be 3, and the edge (u, v) already exists.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many graphs allow for extending Burrows-Wheeler Transformation (BWT) based techniques for efficient pattern matching. Sufficient conditions for doing this are captured by the definition of Wheeler graphs, introduced in [16], and further studied in [3,4,12,15,20]. De Bruijn graphs are themselves Wheeler graphs, hence on a de Bruijn graph exact pattern matching is solvable in linear time.…”
Section: Exact Matching Approximate Matching Solvable In Linear Timementioning
confidence: 99%