Proceedings of the 1997 IEEE/ASME Joint Railroad Conference
DOI: 10.1109/rrcon.1997.581394
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheel forces during flange climb. I. Track loading vehicle tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, the risk of wheel climb derailment will be increased if the traction coefficient is too high at sharp curves because it generates a greater force in the lateral direction, namely toward to the outside of a curve. The force presses the wheelset against the gauge corner of the outer rail and could cause the flange to climb up [1][2] [3]. Therefore, it is important to understand the phenomenon and appropriately control the friction condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the risk of wheel climb derailment will be increased if the traction coefficient is too high at sharp curves because it generates a greater force in the lateral direction, namely toward to the outside of a curve. The force presses the wheelset against the gauge corner of the outer rail and could cause the flange to climb up [1][2] [3]. Therefore, it is important to understand the phenomenon and appropriately control the friction condition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, it is known that high traction coefficient and slip at curves could lead to severe wear and deformation of wheel and rail, energy consumption and squealing noise [1]. It also increases the risk of a wheel climb derailment occurring [2][3] [4]. Nakahara et al reported that the traction condition between a wheel and rail changes with a train traffic passage even in the dry condition [5] and showed some transient traction curves using twin-disk testing which indicated that traction coefficient varies with the evolution of surface roughness during running-in [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, he pointed out that the sum of the derailment coefficients at both sides of the wheelset could be adopted as a criterion in evaluating wheel derailment, and, to a certain extent, corrected the conservative Nadal derailment evaluation criterion under small attack angles. Elkins and Shust [7,8] investigated the influence of friction coefficient and wheel-rail attack angle on rail climbing of wheels. They argued that rail climbing of wheels depended on the vehicle running distance when derailment coefficient is out of safe region rather than the duration of the unsafe derailment coefficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%