The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.3390/s21144845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheat Ear Recognition Based on RetinaNet and Transfer Learning

Abstract: The number of wheat ears is an essential indicator for wheat production and yield estimation, but accurately obtaining wheat ears requires expensive manual cost and labor time. Meanwhile, the characteristics of wheat ears provide less information, and the color is consistent with the background, which can be challenging to obtain the number of wheat ears required. In this paper, the performance of Faster regions with convolutional neural networks (Faster R-CNN) and RetinaNet to predict the number of wheat ears… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The mAP50 values were 91.32, 86.10, and 76.32%, respectively. Li et al (2021) also investigated the GWHD dataset. They trained RetinaNet models using migration learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mAP50 values were 91.32, 86.10, and 76.32%, respectively. Li et al (2021) also investigated the GWHD dataset. They trained RetinaNet models using migration learning.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Pound et al (2017) used the deep learning method to calculate the number of wheat spikes through the images of wheat spikes taken under greenhouse conditions. Hasan et al (2018) and Li et al (2021) use the R-CNN method to detect, count, and analyze wheat spikes, which has high recognition accuracy, but the detection speed is slow and cannot be deployed in real-time detection equipment. Compared with the above methods, our proposed method has a faster detection speed while improving accuracy than the two-stage target detection method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Traditional counting methods rely on field surveys, sampling, and weighing, which is inefficient and time-consuming. It is difficult to use these methods to accurately estimate the yield on a large area, which severely limits their application in seed screening and breeding, pest control, density estimation, gene trait expression, and field management ( Li et al, 2021 ). Due to these reasons, the application of deep learning techniques in detection of wheat spike has received much attention in recent years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%