2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcs.2007.06.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Wheat class identification using monochrome images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The classification accuracies of wheat classes independent of moisture levels using the LDA and QDA models are given in Table 1. Classification accuracies were 89.8 and 85.4% for identifying wheat classes independent of moisture levels using the LDA and QDA, respectively, by analyzing grayscale images of bulk samples [9]. Secondly, moisture levels of wheat classes were represented approximately evenly throughout the analysis range.…”
Section: Identification Of Wheat Classes Independent Of Moisture Levementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The classification accuracies of wheat classes independent of moisture levels using the LDA and QDA models are given in Table 1. Classification accuracies were 89.8 and 85.4% for identifying wheat classes independent of moisture levels using the LDA and QDA, respectively, by analyzing grayscale images of bulk samples [9]. Secondly, moisture levels of wheat classes were represented approximately evenly throughout the analysis range.…”
Section: Identification Of Wheat Classes Independent Of Moisture Levementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The highest classification accuracy of 98.8% for classifying single wheat kernels was based on colour using a divergence feature selection method [30]. Overall classification accuracies were 95-96.3 and 92-94.4% for identifying wheat classes at different moisture levels using the LDA and QDA, respectively, by analyzing monochrome images of bulk samples [9]. The QDA had classification accuracies of 95 and 91% with bootstrap and leaveone-out validation methods, respectively, for pairwise classification within red and white wheat classes using thermal images of bulk samples [10].…”
Section: Identification Of Wheat Classes At Different Moisture Levelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study, Farahani tried to determine the best potential morphologic features to classify 5 different types of durum wheat [7]. Manickavasagan et al tried to measure the ability of a machine vision system with a monochrome camera to classify the different types of western Canadian wheat types by using bulk sample analysis [8]. Williams et al have evaluated two different digital image analysis (DIA) approaches to quantifying wheat seed shape for exploring trait correlations and QTL (Quantitative Trait Loci) mapping [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Except for few studies (Boniecki et al, 2012b;Kujawa et al, 2013) the literature does not provide any publications about the application of these methods to investigate the composting processes. However, the methods of computer image analysis proved to be an adequate and credible tool supporting the classification and assessment of the state of different biomaterials (Delwiche et al, 2013;Jayas, 1999, 2000a,b,c,d;Manickavasagan et al, 2008;Rodríguez-Pulido et al, 2012;Szczypiń ski and Zapotoczny, 2012). They are often used in combination with neural modelling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%