1940
Whealing Capacity of Skin of Newborn or Young Infant
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
12
0
0
0
Citation Types
0
1
0
0
Year Published
1943
1994
Publication Types
Select...
10
2
Relationship
0
12
Authors
Journals
Cited by 12 publications
(1 citation statement)
References 12 publications
0
1
0
0
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Thus, Matheson et al (1952) found that although the newborn infant reacted to histamine, applied to scarified skin, with a flare, this was not followed by the formation of a wheal. However, Sulzberger and Baer (1940) demonstrated that the intracutaneous injection of histamine in the newborn infant induced the characteristic triple response (Lewis, 1927). No increase in vascular permeability has been demonstrated after the intradermal injection of histamine in the newborn rabbit (Rocha e Silva, 1940;Little, 1969a) or rat (Majno, 1964;Dunn, 1974), and even the skin vessels of the 3-month-old rabbit are less sensitive to histamine than those of the adult (Oyvin et al, 1967;Little, 1969a).…”
Section: Local Responses To Injury
mentioning
confidence: 99%
Abstract
Smart CitationsHow this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…Thus, Matheson et al (1952) found that although the newborn infant reacted to histamine, applied to scarified skin, with a flare, this was not followed by the formation of a wheal. However, Sulzberger and Baer (1940) demonstrated that the intracutaneous injection of histamine in the newborn infant induced the characteristic triple response (Lewis, 1927). No increase in vascular permeability has been demonstrated after the intradermal injection of histamine in the newborn rabbit (Rocha e Silva, 1940;Little, 1969a) or rat (Majno, 1964;Dunn, 1974), and even the skin vessels of the 3-month-old rabbit are less sensitive to histamine than those of the adult (Oyvin et al, 1967;Little, 1969a).…”
Section: Local Responses To Injury
mentioning
confidence: 99%
