What you hear may not be what you see: Potential of citizen science methods to use bats as riverine forest quality indicators

Abstract

Mediterranean habitats will be one of the Eurasian ecosystems more strongly affected by Climate Change, especially their riverine systems. Monitoring these ecosystems, which are endemism hotspots and extremely sensitive to changes in rain regimes and extreme weather events like droughts, is of crucial importance. Decades of citizen science projects have proven their utility in highlighting ecological shifts and conservation action priority areas. The Bat Monitoring Programme (www.batmonitoring.org), for instance, has already been used to develop ecological indicators to evaluate the evolution and conservation status of Mediterranean ecosystems. However, using bats as ecological indicators for aquatic ecosystems has resulted in contradicting results, making its application a little controversial. In the present study, we compared two citizen science protocols (visual counting vs. passive acoustic monitoring) used in the Bat Monitoring Programme to test the utility of trawling bats as indicators of Mediterranean riverine habitat quality at both local and landscape scales. By doing so, we aimed to build a specific ecological indicator to determine habitat quality through visual and acoustic counts. Although both protocols presented similar positive significant responses to riverine forest quality, visual counts are suggested as the best sampling approach due to their simplicity and potential within citizen science projects. Moreover, for the first time, we defined threshold values of trawling bat activity to assign different levels of habitat quality to the sampled rivers. We applied them in NE Iberia to exemplify the benefits of using them in a Mediterranean region and discussed the potential, pros and cons of these two citizen science methodologies to establish a pan‐European river biomonitoring programme using trawling bats.