2022
DOI: 10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00276
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Would It Take to Manufacture Perovskite Solar Cells in Space?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
(19 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 185 However, to the best of our knowledge, such devices have not been reported yet, so we encourage the research community to investigate further this aspect. Currently, although PSCs can provide a cheap strategy potentially exploitable for the in situ realization of solar arrays during long-term space exploration missions, 42 there is still significant room for finding the proper materials, architecture, and encapsulation strategies that can really lead to a break-through in the use of such devices for extra-terrestrial (and terrestrial) applications. Finally, prior to the widespread use in the space environment of perovskite technology, the rigorous AIAA-S111 space qualification testing, previously designed for Si and III–V semiconductors, needs to be reconsidered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“… 185 However, to the best of our knowledge, such devices have not been reported yet, so we encourage the research community to investigate further this aspect. Currently, although PSCs can provide a cheap strategy potentially exploitable for the in situ realization of solar arrays during long-term space exploration missions, 42 there is still significant room for finding the proper materials, architecture, and encapsulation strategies that can really lead to a break-through in the use of such devices for extra-terrestrial (and terrestrial) applications. Finally, prior to the widespread use in the space environment of perovskite technology, the rigorous AIAA-S111 space qualification testing, previously designed for Si and III–V semiconductors, needs to be reconsidered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example, for perovskites it may be more appropriate to use lower-energy protons with respect to the current radiation standards, because PSCs have a lower thickness than MJSCs and Si-based devices; thus, high-energy radiation can potentially pass through PSCs without releasing too much energy within the device. 42 For the same reason, the selection of cell packaging, including the substrate, should be assessed by any ground-based testing and stability validation toward harsher radiation doses. With this in mind, we hope that this work will contribute to stimulate further research efforts regarding this highly interesting and exciting topic.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations