2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10648-013-9229-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Works in Writing With Peer Response? A Review of Intervention Studies With Children and Adolescents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Its dual nature makes formative peer assessment a cognitively quite demanding learning task (Van Gennip, Segers, & Tillema, 2009; Van Zundert, Könings, Sluijsmans, & Van Merriënboer, 2012). Instructional scaffolds for formative peer assessment therefore aim to support students in acquiring and consolidating knowledge and skills while tackling the combined demands of the core and the assessment task (Hoogeveen & Van Gelderen, 2013;Van Zundert et al, 2010).…”
Section: Instructional Scaffolds For Supporting Learning From Formatimentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Its dual nature makes formative peer assessment a cognitively quite demanding learning task (Van Gennip, Segers, & Tillema, 2009; Van Zundert, Könings, Sluijsmans, & Van Merriënboer, 2012). Instructional scaffolds for formative peer assessment therefore aim to support students in acquiring and consolidating knowledge and skills while tackling the combined demands of the core and the assessment task (Hoogeveen & Van Gelderen, 2013;Van Zundert et al, 2010).…”
Section: Instructional Scaffolds For Supporting Learning From Formatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instructional scaffolds are thus an interesting factor from the perspective of the instructor / practitioner, and have also become a recent focus in research on peer assessment (Hoogeveen & Van Gelderen, 2013;Van Zundert, Sluijsmans, & Van Merriënboer, 2010). Indeed, all eight contributions to this special issue, even those that also explore learner or domain and task characteristics, employ instructional scaffolds for fostering learning from formative peer assessment.…”
Section: Instructional Scaffolds For Supporting Learning From Formatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond this overall conclusion, the following themes were found to be notable: A cluster of early writing studies focused on describing educators' instructional practices related to writing, but rather than addressing particular topics or angles related to instructional practices, the studies covered a wide range: e.g. a “collaborative writing approach employing a wiki to address the typical weaknesses of young Singaporean Chinese students learning Chinese as second language in Chinese writing” (Wong et al., 2011); the writing behaviours of grade 1 children using word processors (Van Leeuwen and Gabriel, 2007); impact of a “sentence creation intervention” on a young writer with Noonan Syndrome (Asaro-Saddler et al., 2014); the “use of interactive whiteboard technology and interactive talking books in whole-class writing lessons” (Martin, 2007); a review of the use of peer response in writing instruction (Hoogeveen and Gelderen, 2013). Six studies (24%) focused on teachers as subjects, considering teacher practices in ways that related especially to issues of PD for improved early writing instruction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would hypothesise, based on research on the effectiveness of peer response in teaching writing (see Hoogeveen and van Gelderen, 2013), that some of these measures would address the less enthusiastic response to this activity in our study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%