PsycEXTRA Dataset 2004
DOI: 10.1037/e420542008-001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What works in student retention?: Four-year private colleges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Determine the economic impact of college retention programs and the rates of student time to degree completion through a cost-benefit analysis of student dropout rates, persistence assessment procedures, and intervention strategies, thereby enabling informed decision-making with respect to the types of academic and non-academic interventions required, such as remediation and financial support. Habley and McClanahan (2004) also found that the retention practices that made the most significant contributions to reducing student attrition could be broken up into three main 6. requiring remedial or developmental coursework (reported as effective by 9.7% of reporting institutions); and 7. pre-enrollment orientation (reported as effective by 9.2% of reporting institutions).…”
Section: Retention Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Determine the economic impact of college retention programs and the rates of student time to degree completion through a cost-benefit analysis of student dropout rates, persistence assessment procedures, and intervention strategies, thereby enabling informed decision-making with respect to the types of academic and non-academic interventions required, such as remediation and financial support. Habley and McClanahan (2004) also found that the retention practices that made the most significant contributions to reducing student attrition could be broken up into three main 6. requiring remedial or developmental coursework (reported as effective by 9.7% of reporting institutions); and 7. pre-enrollment orientation (reported as effective by 9.2% of reporting institutions).…”
Section: Retention Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Habley and McClanahan (2003) conducted an American College Testing program study exploring the reasons institutions may not fully comprehend the scope of the retention issue and may not know how to effectively counter it. Perhaps surprisingly, the Habley and McClanahan (2004) report revealed a considerable lack of institutional preparation to combat enrollment instability. Habley and McClanahan (2004) surveyed all accredited, degree-granting, two-year and four-year, public and private colleges to assess not only the frequency of particular retention practices but also the influence of those methods.…”
Section: Student Attritionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations