What will make a difference? Assessing the impact of policy and non-policy scenarios on estimations of the future GP workforce

Abstract

BackgroundHealth workforce planning is based on estimates of future needs for and supply of health care services. Given the pipeline time lag for the training of health professionals, inappropriate workforce planning or policies can lead to extended periods of over- or under-supply of health care providers. Often these policy interventions focus on one determinant of supply and do not incorporate other determinants such as changes in population health which impact the need for services.The aim of this study is to examine the effect of the implementation of various workforce policies on the estimated future requirements of the GP workforce, using South Australia as a case study. This is examined in terms of the impact on the workforce gap (excess or shortage), the cost of these workforce policies, and their role in addressing potential non-policy-related future scenarios.MethodsAn integrated simulation model for the general practice workforce in South Australia was developed, which determines the supply and level of services required based on the health of the population over a projection period 2013–2033. The published model is used to assess the effects of various policy and workforce scenarios. For each policy scenario, associated costs were estimated and compared to baseline costs with a 5% discount rate applied.ResultsThe baseline scenario estimated an excess supply of GPs of 236 full-time equivalent (FTE) in 2013 but this surplus decreased to 28 FTE by 2033. The estimates based on single policy scenarios of role substitution and increased training positions continue the surplus, while a scenario that reduces the number of international medical graduates (IMGs) recruited estimated a move from surplus to shortage by 2033. The best-case outcome where the workforce achieves balance by 2023 and remains balanced to 2033, arose when GP participation rates (a non-policy scenario) were combined with the policy levers of increased GP training positions and reduced IMG recruitment. The cost of each policy varied, with increased role substitution and reduced IMG recruitment resulting in savings (AUD$752,946,586 and AUD$3,783,291 respectively) when compared to baseline costs. Increasing GP training costs over the projection period would cost the government an additional AUD$12,719,798.ConclusionsOver the next 20 years, South Australia’s GP workforce is predicted to remain fairly balanced. However, exogenous changes, such as increased demand for GP services may require policy intervention to address associated workforce shortfalls. The workforce model presented in this paper should be updated at regular intervals to inform the need for policy intervention.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12960-017-0216-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Projecting health labor market dynamics for a health system in transition: planning for a resilient health workforce in Saudi Arabia

“…A situation in which a labor shortage exists could call for policy solutions to increase the supply of health workers (production output). Examples of these policy solutions include improving retention through providing early career preparation and workplace support [8], delaying the workforce retirement age [9], and expanding medical [10] and nursing training programs [9].…”

The promise of complementarity: Using the methods of foresight for health workforce planning

“…Using these conventional analyses the workforce numbers, roles and comparative costs for depicted scenarios can be estimated. 52…”

Managing uncertainty in forecasting health workforce demand using the Robust Workforce Planning Framework: the example of midwives in Belgium

“…Therefore, this type of exercise needs to be monitored regularly to ensure that the pathways identified for the future remain plausible in the light of legislative, contextual, epidemiological, social, and scientific developments. Forecasts of the HRH workforce, based on a similar methodology and involving stakeholder groups of comparable size, have been developed in the Netherlands [ 23 ], The United Kingdom [ 24 , 25 ], Portugal [ 26 ] and Australia [ 27 – 29 ], of which three models concerned midwives. In the Netherlands [ 23 ], the training needs of midwives were predicted in 3 steps, combining interviews with 9 experts, 2 workshops with 21 participants to elaborate scenarios and a quantification process based on statistical data and elicitation.…”