New Approaches to Early Child Development 2011
DOI: 10.1057/9780230119338_6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What We Learned about Early Identification and Screening

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A key recommendation of D'Aprano et al (2011) in their Brigance trial was the need for a developmental screening tool that engaged Aboriginal parents in developmental monitoring. This is a view supported by early childhood researchers in other Indigenous contexts (Goelman et al, 2011;Preston, Cottrell, Pelletier, & Pearce, 2012). The adaptations made to the ASQ-3, including modification of items, translation into the local Aboriginal language, illustration of all items, and ensuring administration by interview, resulted in a version that was more accessible to Aboriginal parents and involved them in the developmental process.…”
Section: Clinical Significancementioning
confidence: 83%
“…A key recommendation of D'Aprano et al (2011) in their Brigance trial was the need for a developmental screening tool that engaged Aboriginal parents in developmental monitoring. This is a view supported by early childhood researchers in other Indigenous contexts (Goelman et al, 2011;Preston, Cottrell, Pelletier, & Pearce, 2012). The adaptations made to the ASQ-3, including modification of items, translation into the local Aboriginal language, illustration of all items, and ensuring administration by interview, resulted in a version that was more accessible to Aboriginal parents and involved them in the developmental process.…”
Section: Clinical Significancementioning
confidence: 83%
“…At the same time, researchers examining EI systemic practices for children with diverse developmental needs described issues of inconsistencies and fragmentation of EI‐related information among professionals and for parents (Goelman et al, ). Goelman et al () have further described inconsistencies in follow‐up consultation and assessments for at‐risk infants. These inconsistencies have resulted in an absence of EI services these children may require during their preschool years.…”
Section: Context and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%