What We (Don't) Know so Far About Tolerance Towards Corruption in European Democracies: Measurement Approaches, Determinants, and Types

Abstract

Cross-national survey data shows that for a significant share of European citizens, corruption is acceptable. Notwithstanding the importance of prior knowledge on corruption extension and experience, research has made little progress in exploring why people condone it, especially in unsuspicious countries, with effective institutions and stable democratic rules and processes. The present study examines this gap in the literature by assessing the European Values Study (EVS) and the Special Eurobarometer (EB) attempts at measuring ‘Tolerance towards Corruption’ (TtC) in OECD countries in Europe during the same period (2017–2019). In the end, measurements proved to be constrained by the limited number of questions/items that try to capture TtC, which gave room to conclude that: (a) EVS and EB approaches do not measure the same TtC. The first measures it through social transgressions not exclusively related to corruption, while the second measures the willingness to accept a public-office corruption when dealing with the public sphere. (b) Lower ages combined with individual preferences/perceptions of less satisfaction with life, widespread corruption, and prior experiences with corruption proved to be more relevant to explain TtC, regardless of the country in which individuals were surveyed. (c) The type of TtC citizens display in advanced democracies proved to be mainly contingent on their age and on the way they interpret the extension of corruption and the prior contact they had with a public-office corruption in a given society. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11205-021-02690-y.

Business’ Attitudes Towards Corruption in Selected Central European Countries

“…Moreover, some actions may be considered corruption in one country while acceptable behaviour in another (Chabova, 2017), making it difficult not only to measure but also to fundamentally understand corruption. Tolerance for corruption also varies from country to country, as well as from population group to population group (Gouvêa Maciel, 2021). Even when citizens are aware of the extent of corruption but do not know who is corrupt and who is honest, politicians' enthusiasm to make actual efforts to curb corruption may be low.…”

‘They Accept Bribes; We Accept Bribery’: Conditional Effects of Corrupt Encounters on the Evaluation of Public Institutions

“…By contrast, our argument is an extension of yet another stream of research, arguing that in settings permeated by corruption, it will be perceived as functional and effective, and thus largely acceptable. This, in turn, will attenuate its negative effect on institutional evaluations (Gouvêa Maciel 2021; Pavão 2018). We test our hypothesis using survey data on over 8,000 inhabitants of 389 municipalities located in eleven countries of Central and Eastern Europe.…”