2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-010-0567-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What We Believe Is Not Always What We Do: An Empirical Investigation into Ethically Questionable Behavior in Consumption

Abstract: consumer ethics, consumer fraud, ethical decision-making, ethical intention, theory of planned behavior,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
32
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(44 reference statements)
3
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This paper considers microlevel variables on attitude, intention and behaviour. Future research may incorporate price, government incentives and environmental benefits at the macrolevel. The TPB can be misleading as consumers sometimes report an intent to purchase, but do not follow through (Carrington et al, ; Fukukawa & Ennew, ). Testing consumer follow‐through with the TRA in the context of reused/recycled content at different price points is advisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper considers microlevel variables on attitude, intention and behaviour. Future research may incorporate price, government incentives and environmental benefits at the macrolevel. The TPB can be misleading as consumers sometimes report an intent to purchase, but do not follow through (Carrington et al, ; Fukukawa & Ennew, ). Testing consumer follow‐through with the TRA in the context of reused/recycled content at different price points is advisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The TPB can be misleading as consumers sometimes report an intent to purchase, but do not follow through (Carrington et al, 2010;Fukukawa & Ennew, 2010). Testing consumer followthrough with the TRA in the context of reused/recycled content at different price points is advisable.…”
Section: Future Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…People often explain away their self‐serving behaviors by attributing them to upholding other values (e.g., explaining an unfair behavior that benefits the self as altruism toward a close other who also unfairly benefits; Gino, Ayal, & Ariely, ). Feeling as if one has been cheated by another also results in more immoral behavior by decreasing feelings of guilt about these unethical behaviors at the “unfair” individual's expense (Fukukawa & Ennew, ). Even reporting high concern and good intentions toward helping others can make people feel less obligated to act upon those feelings (White & Plous, ).…”
Section: Moral Hypocrisy: the Construct With A Thousand Facesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 The estimation of these thresholds is theoretically and empirically essential because it allows an in depth analysis of the Muslim consumer behavior. Much of the empirical research, which seeks to understand the ethical dimension in consumer behavior, is based on questionnaires and surveys of consumers (Fukukawa and Ennew 2010). By using specific instrumental variables, we suggest measures of the ethicalness of the consumer behavior; we find the appropriate indexvariable indicating (un)ethical consumption.…”
Section: Fairness In Spendingmentioning
confidence: 99%