What type of rural? Assessing the variations in life expectancy at birth at small area-level for a small population province using classes of locally defined settlement types

Abstract

BackgroundAlthough efforts have been made to articulate rural–urban health inequalities in recent years, results have been inconsistent due to different geographical scales used in these studies. Small-area level investigations of health inequalities will likely show more detailed pictures of health inequalities among diverse rural communities, but they are difficult to conduct, particularly in a small population region. The objectives of this study were: 1) to compare life expectancy at birth for females and males across small-areas classified by locally defined settlement types for a small province in Canada; 2) to assess whether any of the settlement types explains variations in life expectancy over and above the extent of socioeconomic disadvantage and social isolation; and 3) to examine variations in life expectancies within a (larger) area unit used as the basis of health inequality investigations in previous studies.MethodsSeven settlement types were determined for the ‘community’ units based on population per-kilometre-road density and settlement forms. Mean life expectancies at birth for both genders were compared by settlement type, both for the entire province and within the Halifax Regional Municipality—the province's only census designated metropolitan area, but also contains rural settlements. Linear regression analyses were conducted to assess the statistical associations between life expectancy and the settlement types, adjusting for indicators of community-level deprivation.ResultsWhile types of communities considered as ‘rural’ generally had lower life expectancy for both genders, the effects of living in any settlement type were attenuated once adjusted for socioeconomic deprivation and social isolation. An exception was the village and settlement cluster type, which had additionally negative effects on health for females. There were some variations observed within the Halifax Regional Municipality, suggesting the importance of further investigating a variety of health and disease outcomes at smaller area-levels than those employed in previous studies.ConclusionsThis paper highlighted the importance of further articulating the differences in the characteristics of rural at finer area-levels and the differential influence they may have on health. Further efforts are desirable to overcome various data challenges in order to extend the investigation of health inequalities to hard-to-study provinces.

Life expectancy of different ethnic groups using death records linked to population census data for 4.62 million people in Scotland

“…This is a robust method for calculating life expectancy estimates for geographical areas11 and specific populations 12. To create the life tables, populations and deaths were counted by ethnic group, sex and 5-year age bands (except for 0, 1–4 and >85 years).…”

A small-area analysis of inequalities in chronic disease prevalence across urban and non-urban communities in the Province of Nova Scotia, Canada, 2007–2011

“…Communities were classified into three settlement types based on population density (per kilometre road) using geometric intervals—a method which minimises within-group variance—and using Google Earth satellite images. 22 There were 29 ‘urban’ (Halifax Metro and adjacent) communities, 58 ‘towns’ (mid-size to small-size towns outside of Halifax Metro) and 113 sparse ‘rural’ communities. Figure 1 shows the spatial distribution of communities in the province by three settlement types.…”

Misclassification errors from postal code-based geocoding to assign census geography in Nova Scotia, Canada

“…The analysis may be at an area level only; 10,11 or may be multilevel -involving both area-and individual-level variables. 9,12,13 Using highly accurate locational data for all buildings in Nova Scotia, this paper estimated the extent of locational misclassification error, by levels or rurality, resulting from the use of PCCF+ to geocode six-digit postal codes to census geographic areas.…”