What type of learner are your students? Preferred learning styles of undergraduate gross anatomy students according to the index of learning styles questionnaire

Abstract

Students learn and process information in many different ways. Learning styles are useful as they allow instructors to learn more about students, as well as aid in the development and application of useful teaching approaches and techniques. At the undergraduate level there is a noticeable lack of research on learning style preferences of students enrolled in gross anatomy courses. The Index of Learning Styles (ILS) questionnaire was administered to students enrolled in a large enrollment undergraduate gross anatomy course with laboratory to determine their preferred learning styles. The predominant preferred learning styles of the students (n = 505) enrolled in the gross anatomy course were active (54.9%), sensing (85.1%), visual (81.2%), and sequential (74.4%). Preferred learning styles profiles of particular majors enrolled in the course were also constructed; analyses showed minor variation in the active/reflective dimension. An understanding of students' preferred learning styles can guide course design but it should not be implemented in isolation. It can be strengthened (or weakened) by concurrent use of other tools (e.g., flipped classroom course design). Based on the preferred learning styles of the majority of undergraduate students in this particular gross anatomy course, course activities can be hands on (i.e., active), grounded in concrete information (i.e., sensing), utilize visual representation such as images, figures, models, etc. (i.e., visual), and move in small incremental steps that build on each topic (i.e., sequential). Anat Sci Educ 11: 358-365. © 2017 American Association of Anatomists.

Umfrage zum Bedarf einer e-Learning-Plattform für Ärzte in der HNO-Facharzt-Weiterbildung

“…Zusätzlich lassen sich digitale Lerninhalte leichter und schneller aktualisieren. Damit erscheint die Vermittlung von klinischen Befunden auf verschiedenen Wegen zusätzlich möglich, die mit dem Ansprechen verschiedener sensorischer Kanäle die heterogenen Lerntypen unter den Medizinstudierenden gleichermaßen ansprechen [7].…”

Design, Dissemination, and Assessment of NephSIM: A Mobile-Optimized Nephrology Teaching Tool

“…The Index of Learning Styles describes 4 domains: active versus reflective, sensing versus intuitive, visual versus verbal, and sequential versus global. [13][14][15] Users of NephSIM, who are provided with infographics and illustrations, actively participate as the case unfolds sequentially, by completing differential diagnoses and receiving both positive and negative iterative feedback. Thus, NephSIM content appeals to a variety of these styles, including dominant ones (active, sensing, visual, and sequential).…”

Web-Based Immersive Patient Simulator as a Curricular Tool for Objective Structured Clinical Examination Preparation in Surgery: Development and Evaluation

“…However, these findings may be influenced by the fact that participation in this study was on a voluntary basis which is known to possibly bias the result as motivated students more often agree to participation than less motivated students [ 11 ]. It is important to note that learners have different learning styles and thus not all learners are equally responsive to this educational tool [ 12 ]. Hence, the results cannot be generalized for all students.…”