2011 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence, Cognitive Algorithms, Mind, and Brain (CCMB) 2011
DOI: 10.1109/ccmb.2011.5952120
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What to measure next to improve decision making? On top-down task driven feature saliency

Abstract: Top-down attention is modeled as decision making based on incomplete information. We consider decisions made in a sequential measurement situation where initially only an incomplete input feature vector is available, however, where we are given the possibility to acquire additional input values among the missing features. The procecure thus poses the question what to do next? We take an information theoretical approach implemented for generality in a generative mixture model. The framework allows us reduce the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Task-driven top-down attention as in [5] is obtained when β = 1, γ = ∞. In this work we use β = 0.2, γ = 0.33.…”
Section: A Attention Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Task-driven top-down attention as in [5] is obtained when β = 1, γ = ∞. In this work we use β = 0.2, γ = 0.33.…”
Section: A Attention Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these expressions µ j,k , σ More details and further references are given in [5], where the attention model was validated on four benchmark classification problems and shown to outperform a 'random' attention alternative.…”
Section: A Attention Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations