2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.ufug.2021.126986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What to do in, and what to expect from, urban green spaces – Indicator-based approach to assess cultural ecosystem services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the greenness and public accessibility were modeled separately, they can be seen as independent of each other. Therefore, the combination of these two frames of discernment was achieved by building the Cartesian product of them which yielded the new joint frame of discernment θ pg θ pg = θ p × θ g = {(green, public), (green, private), (grey, public), (grey, private)} (11) For the final fusion, the probability masses of the two models were converted to the new frame of discernment θ pg using m({(green, private), (green, public)}) = m({green}) (12) m({(grey, private), (grey, public)}) = m({grey}) (13) m({(green, public), (grey, public)}) = m({public})…”
Section: Fusion Of Greenness and Public Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since the greenness and public accessibility were modeled separately, they can be seen as independent of each other. Therefore, the combination of these two frames of discernment was achieved by building the Cartesian product of them which yielded the new joint frame of discernment θ pg θ pg = θ p × θ g = {(green, public), (green, private), (grey, public), (grey, private)} (11) For the final fusion, the probability masses of the two models were converted to the new frame of discernment θ pg using m({(green, private), (green, public)}) = m({green}) (12) m({(grey, private), (grey, public)}) = m({grey}) (13) m({(green, public), (grey, public)}) = m({public})…”
Section: Fusion Of Greenness and Public Accessibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies even suggest that sufficient accessibility to nearby public green spaces is beneficial to the well-being and mental health of citizens [6][7][8][9] and urban nature is seen as resilient infrastructure in times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic [10]. Hence, it is very important to provide citizens and city planners with the necessary information about the location and qualities of public urban green spaces [11,12] to identify disparities and take them into account in future planning [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the experimental conclusions, this study focused on the ecosystem service value of trees under the low-carbon goal; the final conclusion also served this goal. However, the landscape and biodiversity of urban trees should also be carefully considered [59,60]. Although this study suggests the selection of high-value tree species, choosing only one or two species should be avoided.…”
Section: Limitations and Caveatsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To better interpret the results of an SDSS, sensitivity analyses are used to examine the extent of output variation in a model when parameters are varied systematically over a certain range (Delgado and Sendra, 2004). Former studies on the assessment of urban green spaces using SDSS supported several research fields such as monitoring urban green spaces to aid local authorities for the enhancement of urban green spaces (Pelizaro et al, 2005), analyzing urban green spaces in terms of accessibility and quality to support sustainable urban planning (Stessens et al, 2017;Meng and Malczewski, 2015), and evaluating the suitability of sites for the further development of urban green spaces (Li et al, 2018). In this context, this paper presents a newly developed SDSS approach that allows the evaluation of urban green spaces in terms of their suitability upon a range of recreational activities.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%