2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2020.04.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What the salamander eye has been telling the vision scientist’s brain

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 189 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Visual processing in the retina has been probed for decades by examining the light response properties of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in several animal models, including salamander, mouse, rabbit, cat, and monkey. The assembled findings indicate that although the functional organization of RGCs has some broad similarities across species --notably, a subdivision into discrete RGC types that encode different aspects of the visual scene --substantial anatomical and physiological differences between species suggest varying degrees of relevance for understanding human vision [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Among animal models, the macaque monkey is widely considered to be the most relevant for human vision, for several reasons: phylogenetic proximity, similar natural visual environment, similar visual behaviors, similar gross and fine structure of the retina, and similar anatomically identified RGC types [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Visual processing in the retina has been probed for decades by examining the light response properties of retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in several animal models, including salamander, mouse, rabbit, cat, and monkey. The assembled findings indicate that although the functional organization of RGCs has some broad similarities across species --notably, a subdivision into discrete RGC types that encode different aspects of the visual scene --substantial anatomical and physiological differences between species suggest varying degrees of relevance for understanding human vision [1][2][3][4][5][6]. Among animal models, the macaque monkey is widely considered to be the most relevant for human vision, for several reasons: phylogenetic proximity, similar natural visual environment, similar visual behaviors, similar gross and fine structure of the retina, and similar anatomically identified RGC types [7][8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…They are again missing in eutherian mammals [ 3 ]. By contrast, blue rods are only present in amphibians [ 21 , 38 ] and therefore probably emerged after their lineage had already diverged from that of subsequent terrestrial species. The origin of double cones is debated, but their anatomical similarity to pairs of ancestral red and green cones in the eyes of fish [ 18 ] points at their joint duplication as a likely candidate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the question whether there are systematic differences between different classes of ganglion cells. For the salamander retina, a general classification scheme of ganglion cells is still lacking [46], and physiological classifications are typically based on preferred contrast (ON versus OFF) and temporal filtering kinetics [10,41,47,48]. Following these lines, we here divided the recorded OFF ganglion cells into four groups by a cluster analysis (see Materials and Methods), according to their receptive field size and temporal filtering kinetics (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%