What Students Can Do to Take the Burden off You

Hardaway, Francine

doi:10.2307/374822

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Enlisting Other Readers1

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

1982

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article4

Book1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent5

Authors

Journals

Cited by 6 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…All the inventories and underlining strategies surveyed in this chapter can be employed as guides by peer evaluators who read and mark other student papers. Another effective strategy is to schedule twenty-to thirty-minute periods in which students can react to each other's writing in pairs or in groups of three to six members (Hardaway, 1975;Jacko, 1978;Memering, 1973).…”

Section: Enlisting Other Readersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responding to student writing

MacAllister

1982

New Drctns for Teach & Learn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Enlisting Other Readersmentioning

confidence: 99%

Responding to student writing

MacAllister

1982

New Drctns for Teach & Learn

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

References

1988

ASHE‐ERIC High. Edu. Rept.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Digital Student Peer Review Programs

Anson

2023

Digital Writing Technologies in Higher Education

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Student peer review of drafts in progress was a staple of writing instruction for decades before computers: students exchange and discussed typed or handwritten drafts in small groups of three or four. With the advent of digital connectivity, students could circulate electronic versions of their texts, then read and annotate drafts online. Simultaneously, digital peer review systems were developed that not only facilitated student response but included learning analytics as well as features such as repositories of comments to prompt student response, badges, sticky notes, and feedback mechanisms that evaluated the quality of the response; anonymous response also became possible (see Lu & Bol, 2007). After a brief historical introduction, this chapter focuses primarily on digital peer review systems and peer review systems built into LMSs such as Canvas. The chapter describes the nature and range of digital peer review systems and includes a summary of research on their effectiveness.

show abstract

What Students Can Do to Take the Burden off You

Cited by 6 publications

References 0 publications

Responding to student writing

Responding to student writing

References

Digital Student Peer Review Programs

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About