2017
DOI: 10.23736/s0021-9509.16.09845-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What should we expect from the hybrid room?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These properties of the hybrid OR allow the combination of open and percutaneous interventions, which avoids the need to perform multiple consecutive procedures or intraoperative patient transport. The advanced imaging techniques facilitate planning of the procedure based on the current intraoperative situation, real-time intraoperative guidance, and direct assessment of technical success at the end of the procedure [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These properties of the hybrid OR allow the combination of open and percutaneous interventions, which avoids the need to perform multiple consecutive procedures or intraoperative patient transport. The advanced imaging techniques facilitate planning of the procedure based on the current intraoperative situation, real-time intraoperative guidance, and direct assessment of technical success at the end of the procedure [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hypothesized benefit of IGS is an improvement in surgical performance and reduce the risk of secondary procedures by enabling intraoperative evaluation of surgical success (e.g., surgical margin status), and ultimately improvement in clinical outcomes. 1,[5][6][7][8] The use of IGS in oncology could, for instance, enable intraoperative evaluation of surgical margin status. Considering that the risk of recurrence is associated with positive surgical margins, IGS could play an important role in the future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fusion imaging technique) with a common result of increased performances and precision in deployment. [3][4][5] However, many Authors agree considering the bridging stent components as the Achilles' heel of this technique: in fact, the updated results available in literature show a lower target vessel patency and a higher reintervention rate compared to open repair. 6 Bare metal stents and covered stents have been implanted in fenestrated (FEVAR) and branched endografts (BEVAR).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%