2022
DOI: 10.1515/9780823293520
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Should We Do with Our Brain?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0
10

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
48
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…In her 2008 book What Should We Do with Our Brain?, French philosopher Catherine Malabou writes that 'the word plasticity has two basic senses: it can mean the capacity to receive form (clay is called ''plastic,'' for example) and the capacity to give form (as in the plastic arts or in plastic surgery).' 1 She then adds a third sense -the 'explosion' of form (as with reference to the French words plastiquage and plastiquer), which she calls 'destructive plasticity', such as in the neurodegenerative disorder of Alzheimer's disease. However, it is only more than a decade later with the publication of her book Morphing Intelligence: From IQ Measurement to Artifi cial Brains (2021) that she begins to assert this same 'plasticity' as the key in establishing a 'mirroring' relationship between the brain and the computer.…”
Section: Architectural Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In her 2008 book What Should We Do with Our Brain?, French philosopher Catherine Malabou writes that 'the word plasticity has two basic senses: it can mean the capacity to receive form (clay is called ''plastic,'' for example) and the capacity to give form (as in the plastic arts or in plastic surgery).' 1 She then adds a third sense -the 'explosion' of form (as with reference to the French words plastiquage and plastiquer), which she calls 'destructive plasticity', such as in the neurodegenerative disorder of Alzheimer's disease. However, it is only more than a decade later with the publication of her book Morphing Intelligence: From IQ Measurement to Artifi cial Brains (2021) that she begins to assert this same 'plasticity' as the key in establishing a 'mirroring' relationship between the brain and the computer.…”
Section: Architectural Plasticitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Today, we cannot help but pose questions about the brain and how it works. Alftberg and Bentsen (2018) say that “any vision of the human brain is necessarily shaped by our historical background and social and cultural context.” During the course of our lives, the brain has gone from being a central telephone switchboard to a relay station with switches that go on or off, to a machine, to a command center governing the body, to a computer (Malabou 2008), to a dynamic and decentralized series of functional networks, each of which can take advantage of the same brain areas but for completely different purposes (Altermark 2014). Neuroplasticity, along with neurogenesis, has completely transformed our view of the brain, to one in which functions of damaged parts can be retrained by other parts and nerve cells continue to appear and grow throughout adult life.…”
Section: Neurosciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The idea of living being propounded by molecular biology which opened the century of the genome (Kay, 2000) is being criticised by 'organismal' biology in the light of the inherent 'historicity' and variability of the organism (Soto et al, 2016). Against the hardware/software model that has dominated neurosciences for a few decades, a tendency of studying the brain and neurosynaptic structures through the concept of plasticity is gaining pace (Malabou, 2008). In mathematics, a rethinking of modelling practices is being elaborated that shifts the focus from 'dynamical structuralism' (Thom, 1972(Thom, /1975 to the 'heterogenous virtual' (Sarti et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%