“What should I say to my employer… if anything?”- My disability disclosure dilemma

Abstract

PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to explore the key issues surrounding teacher/staff disability disclosures in the UK's further education (FE) sector.Design/methodology/approachIn total, 15 semi-structured interviews were conducted in a medium-sized FE college (case study) setting in the South East of England. To compare the experiences, views and perceptions of leaders, managers and teachers, interviews were carried out with leaders and managers who are accountable for ensuring disability legislation is adhered to, and with teachers who are responsible for complying with equality and disability legislation. The 15 interviewees who volunteered to take part in this research represent the various layers of the organisational structure and different academic departments in the college.FindingsTwo major themes discussed include: the desire for teaching staff to “come out” and make a disability disclosure and the perception of disability as a “deficit”. A number of staff that disclosed their hidden disabilities stated they would not do so again. To avoid the negative side effects, developing a “culture of disability disclosure” and providing long-term employer support are required.Research limitations/implicationsThis is an exploratory qualitative case study that highlights some of the key issues from a teacher/staff perspective. It is not meant to be generalisable research, but the ideas therein should help to develop a wider (empirical) research agenda.Originality/valueThere is an abundance of critical and sociological research concerning disability disclosure in general; there are also a number of scholarly studies that focus on disability issues from the student perspective. However, this is the first scholarly study that explores the key issues involving FE staff.

“You Don’t Look Dyslexic”: Using the Job Demands—Resource Model of Burnout to Explore Employment Experiences of Australian Adults with Dyslexia

“…It appears from the research that without a coordinated effort from employers, managers, workplace leaders and human resources staff to provide accommodations and adjustments, employees with dyslexia are likely to struggle to complete designated work tasks [ 24 , 30 , 32 ]. However, when employers and workplace leaders have insufficient knowledge about dyslexia, employees with dyslexia are more reluctant to disclose their condition, fearful that exposure may result in stigma and discrimination [ 21 , 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 ]. This is unfortunate, given the evidence demonstrating that disclosure can have positive effects on a worker’s health, social relationships, self-identity and job performance, as well as the organisation in which the worker is employed [ 37 , 38 ].…”

Diversity and inclusion in the legal profession: disclosure of cancer and other health conditions by lawyers with disabilities and lawyers who identify as LGBTQ +

“…Taken all together, research shows both benefits and risks associated with disclosure of disabilities in the workplace [ 16 , 64 ]. Many employees who choose to self-disclose experience negative consequences and come to regret their disclosure [ 16 , 52 , 65 , 66 ]. Yet, for purposes of the ADA, formal disclosure is crucial to requesting accommodations [ 29 , 45 ], and identity concealment can inhibit workers’ rightful opportunities to obtain effective accommodations and make full use of their job capabilities [ 37 ].…”

Inclusivity in Online Postgraduate Teaching

“…Paradoxically, in programmes that have successfully integrated their staff, those individuals may essentially become invisible. Visibility serves to elevate individual teachers to the status of role models, who could positively influence students to share their own challenges with the teacher, their peers and the educational establishment (Marshall et al 2020). In the next section, three groups of teachers who are at particular risk of marginalisation are considered, alongside the particular factors to respect in supporting them to not only survive, but to meaningfully contribute to the online postgraduate education community.…”

“…In a general survey of American workers who identified as having impairments, almost a quarter of respondents who declared their impairment to their employer experienced long-term negative repercussions such as lowered expectations from their manager, isolation from colleagues and increased likelihood of losing their job (von Schrader et al 2014). Academic staff facing additional challenges as teachers in higher education are unlikely to declare an impairment, particularly if it relates to a specific cognitive impairment or their mental health (Marshall et al 2020;Singleton 1999). Inequality is not experienced equally by all marginalised groups.…”

“…However, in order to fulfil that role, institutions need to be aware of the need for it. While teachers may wish to share the specific nature of their needs with their employer, this can be prevented if they believe that the employer views those needs as an intrinsic deficit (Marshall et al 2020). Academia has an inherent culture of overwork which has become normalised.…”