2021
DOI: 10.1007/s11406-021-00367-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What Should Conceptual Engineering Be All About?

Abstract: Conceptual engineering is commonly characterized as the method for assessing and improving our representational devices. Little has been said, however, on how best to construe these representational devices—in other words, on what conceptual engineering should be all about. This paper tackles this problem with a basic strategy: First, by presenting a taxonomy of the different possible subject matters for conceptual engineering; then, by comparatively assessing them and selecting the most conducive one with a v… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Now that we have clarified the process, let us turn to target objects: what is it that conceptual engineers are engineering? This question has recently received a fair amount of attention (Haslanger, 2020a, 2020b; Isaac, 2021a, c; Koch, 2021a; Machery, 2017; Richard, 2020; Sawyer, 2018, 2020a, 2020b, 2021; Scharp, 2013), in part because the notion of a concept is itself a candidate for re‐engineering (Chalmers, 2020; Isaac, 2020; Scharp, 2020; Thomasson, 2020) and partly because a number of authors actively resist the idea that conceptual engineering has much to do with concepts at all (Cappelen, 2018; Flocke, 2020; Nado, 2020, 2021a; Pinder, 2021; Thomasson, 2021; see Nefdt, 2021 and Sawyer, 2020a for criticism). In what follows, we develop a pluralistic response to this issue 9 .…”
Section: Goals and Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Now that we have clarified the process, let us turn to target objects: what is it that conceptual engineers are engineering? This question has recently received a fair amount of attention (Haslanger, 2020a, 2020b; Isaac, 2021a, c; Koch, 2021a; Machery, 2017; Richard, 2020; Sawyer, 2018, 2020a, 2020b, 2021; Scharp, 2013), in part because the notion of a concept is itself a candidate for re‐engineering (Chalmers, 2020; Isaac, 2020; Scharp, 2020; Thomasson, 2020) and partly because a number of authors actively resist the idea that conceptual engineering has much to do with concepts at all (Cappelen, 2018; Flocke, 2020; Nado, 2020, 2021a; Pinder, 2021; Thomasson, 2021; see Nefdt, 2021 and Sawyer, 2020a for criticism). In what follows, we develop a pluralistic response to this issue 9 .…”
Section: Goals and Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of conceptual content can, but need not, coincide with what we earlier described as a concept's application conditions (cf. Isaac, 2020, 2021a, b, c; Koch, 2021a; Machery, 2017, 2021). Thus, where the conceptual engineer's goal is to alter the unconscious and automatic inferences that people are likely to draw about what they encounter, psychologically construed conceptual content is a plausible target of their endeavors.…”
Section: Goals and Targetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3 Firstly, concepts are usually treated as representational devices that serve cognitive functions for the execution of some cognitive tasks-that is, tasks whose execution requires the exercise of some cognitive competences. For instance, how the concept of sexual harassment enables its victims to make sense of the offensives they have experienced in a hostile work environment, or how the concepts of the GDP 2 See Isaac (2021b) on why conceptual engineering should be about concepts, instead of any other representational devices (linguistic meanings, intensions, speaker-meanings, etc. ), on pain of pragmatic inconsistencies otherwise.…”
Section: The Basicsmentioning
confidence: 99%