What Should Be Considered When Evaluating the Quality of Home Care? A Survey of Expert Opinions on the Evaluation of the Quality of Home Care in Japan

Abstract

Intending to obtain scientific evidence to use in developing indicators for evaluating the quality of home care, we surveyed doctors, nurses, and other home care professionals to determine the points they consider to be essential in evaluating home care. We investigated all 901 clinics registered to the National Association of Medical Institutions Supporting Home Care and a random sample of 600 Visiting Nurse Service stations registered to the National Association for Visiting Nurse Service in Japan. A total of 539 questionnaire responses were received (response rate: 35.9%). In this study, a factor analysis revealed four factors to be considered when evaluating the quality of home care: (1) patients’ and family members’ level of satisfaction, (2) home care process, (3) structure of home care, and (4) medical outcomes. The factor of the satisfaction of patients and family members identified in the present study was not considered in previous studies for evaluating the quality of care in Japan. Satisfaction is the point of difference in goals between hospital-based care and home care, and it requires different measurement indicators. Home care professionals expect to help relieve the physical and psychological burden felt by the patient and their family. Thus, on the evaluation indicators of quality of home care, their perspectives from the present study are valuable.

The Effect of Home Care Poverty on the Activities of Daily Living among Older Adults in China: A Propensity Score Matching Study

“…Although home care for disabled older adults can decrease hospital care costs, resources vary widely between individuals and families. Studies have found that most older people do not receive adequate care services at home, especially those with particular diseases ( 13 – 15 ). For example, approximately one quarter of older persons with memory problems reported that they did not receive adequate care services, and that even a combination of informal and formal home care was insufficient to meet their needs ( 16 ).…”

Implications of end‐of‐life home care compared with hospital‐based care during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A case report

“…This form of care is actively practiced in some countries, including Japan, where reimbursement for home care is available, including for patients with cancer and palliative care needs. 3 , 4 In Japan, a state of emergency due to COVID‐19 was declared in April 2020, and to date, the infection has not been well controlled. Hospitals have implemented restrictions on the number of people who can visit hospitalized patients.…”

“…Home care is a form of care in which patients stay at home with the help of their families, nurses, care workers, doctors and other health care professionals. This form of care is actively practiced in some countries, including Japan, where reimbursement for home care is available, including for patients with cancer and palliative care needs 3,4 . In Japan, a state of emergency due to COVID‐19 was declared in April 2020, and to date, the infection has not been well controlled.…”