1996
DOI: 10.1016/s0165-1765(96)00889-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What shapes are overtime premium schedules? Some evidence from Japan, the UK, and the US

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dependent variable is the natural log of the respondent's gross weekly pay divided by their basic hours of work plus their paid overtime hours, where the latter are multiplied by 1.3 to reflect higher pay for these hours (Hart et al, 1996). The wage equations include standard human capital variables such as education and experience.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dependent variable is the natural log of the respondent's gross weekly pay divided by their basic hours of work plus their paid overtime hours, where the latter are multiplied by 1.3 to reflect higher pay for these hours (Hart et al, 1996). The wage equations include standard human capital variables such as education and experience.…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attempts at resolving this conflict between theory and evidence focused on imposing a particular structure on the production technology (Hart, 1987;Calmfors and Hoel, 1988;Leslie, 1991) or specifying the overtime premium as a increasing function of hours worked. Hart subsequently found that, in the data, increases with hours in Japan, but not in the UK or US (Hart and Ruffell, 1993;Hart et al, 1996;Bell and Hart, 1999). The well-established empirical result that dHads H b 0 remains a puzzle.…”
Section: The Demand For Employment Effects Of a Reduction In Hoursmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The received wisdom is that work-sharing can only be obtained if there is no overtime. Attempts to amend overtime models to generate a prediction favourable to work-sharing (Hart, 1987;Calmfors and Hoel, 1988;Leslie, 1991) have proved rather unsuccessful empirically (Hart and Ruffell, 1993;Hart, Malley and Ruffell, 1996;Bell and Hart, 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…to an increasing overtime premium." Hart and Ruffell (1993) and Hart, Malley et al (1996) conclude that there is little empirical evidence for increasing overtime premiums as a function of overtime hours. Equation (3.6) combines both panels.…”
Section: "Axmentioning
confidence: 99%