2019
DOI: 10.1080/02680939.2019.1706103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What’s wrong with ‘deliverology’? Performance measurement, accountability and quality improvement in English secondary education

Abstract: If citing, it is advised that you check and use the publisher's definitive version for pagination, volume/issue, and date of publication details. And where the final published version is provided on the Research Portal, if citing you are again advised to check the publisher's website for any subsequent corrections.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These latter views point to potential discrepancies in evidence-use practices that might exist amongst different types of position-holders in policymaking processes; that evidence-use practices are related to the position of individuals or organisations within the ensemble of power. They are also indicative of evidence-use as a mechanism for accountability, thus mirroring the drive for accountability in the education system (Gewirtz et al, 2019). That is to say, the use of evidence as proof resonates with "a neoliberal faith in the fact that those key features of the world worth measuring can be objectively evaluated and expressed numerically in this act of accountability" (Hursh et al, 2015, p. 306).…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These latter views point to potential discrepancies in evidence-use practices that might exist amongst different types of position-holders in policymaking processes; that evidence-use practices are related to the position of individuals or organisations within the ensemble of power. They are also indicative of evidence-use as a mechanism for accountability, thus mirroring the drive for accountability in the education system (Gewirtz et al, 2019). That is to say, the use of evidence as proof resonates with "a neoliberal faith in the fact that those key features of the world worth measuring can be objectively evaluated and expressed numerically in this act of accountability" (Hursh et al, 2015, p. 306).…”
Section: Evidencementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In this educational context, schools experience intense pressure to achieve high student attainment and inspection results. Amidst such 'high-stakes' concerns teachers freedoms are limited (Gewirtz et al, 2019) and other aspects of education are side-lined.…”
Section: The Sdgs Recommit the World To Sustainable Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Quality assurance is about convincing others about the adequacy of that processes of learning. (Harvey, 2007, p. 5) This distinction is often absent in discussions about education and teacher education, where the focus on quality orientates around discussions of the most appropriate metrics, and indicators, rather than the learning itself (Bartell, Floden & Richmond, 2018;Firestone & Donaldson, 2019;Gewirtz et al, 2019;Skedsmo & Huber, 2019). Harvey distinguishes between definitions of quality and that of standards (see Table 1).…”
Section: Different Ways Of Understanding Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In England, the teachers' discussions of ethical global issues pedagogy related strongly to the high stakes testing culture 5 . While it presents a significant constraint to teachers (e.g., Gewirtz et al, 2019), a surprising finding was how the HEADSUP tool supported them to be creative and strategic within this culture. A participant in London expressed this:…”
Section: Surprising Mediations Of Policy Culture and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%