2008
DOI: 10.1080/00221546.2008.11772101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

“What's too much and what's too little?”: The Process of Becoming an Independent Researcher in Doctoral Education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
243
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 243 publications
(263 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
243
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…In light of the number of potential stressors and the complex work situation of doctoral students, it is a challenge for them to maintain a healthy work–life balance (Golde, 2005). Attrition rates are high, up to 50%, depending on doctoral discipline and country (Gardner, 2008; Jiranek, 2010; Lovitts & Nelson, 2000) and some leave academia after completing their doctoral programme, pursuing other careers. Furthermore, there is evidence that the scholarly communities do not always provide optimal opportunities for doctoral students to participate in.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In light of the number of potential stressors and the complex work situation of doctoral students, it is a challenge for them to maintain a healthy work–life balance (Golde, 2005). Attrition rates are high, up to 50%, depending on doctoral discipline and country (Gardner, 2008; Jiranek, 2010; Lovitts & Nelson, 2000) and some leave academia after completing their doctoral programme, pursuing other careers. Furthermore, there is evidence that the scholarly communities do not always provide optimal opportunities for doctoral students to participate in.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the mapped identity was multifaceted rather than fragmented as Henkel (2000) would lead us to expect, internal tensions in my understanding of my academic role were revealed which echo the findings of Clouder, Deepwell and King (2009). However, the clustering of different attributes within my island disclosed a growing sense of legitimacy which mirrors the social transition of research students (Gardner, 2008) and the "internal, self-based validation" of Åkerlind's (2011, p. 185) established academics.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such inquiry is clearly necessary, as it is often cited as a limitation in these bodies of work (Crede & Borrego, 2012;Gardner, 2008aGardner, , 2008bLindholm, 2004). It is possible that who individuals are (e.g., gender, race, marital status), their parents' educational backgrounds and occupations, and their individual experiences (e.g., financial debt, co-curricular involvement) also inform their professorial intentions.…”
Section: Individualized Factors and Experiences That Shape Intentionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of this article, "socialization" refers to how graduate students come to adapt to academic and institutional norms and behaviors, and to the graduate student role (Antony & Taylor, 2001;Austin, 2002;Austin & McDaniels, 2006;Gardner, 2008aGardner, & 2008bNyquist, et al, 1999;Weidman & Stein, 2003;Weidman, Twale, & Stein, 2001). Through various socializing relationships and practices, students start as newcomers to an institution, academic department, or program, and learn how to negotiate and navigate their academic and disciplinary communities (Baker, Pifer, & Flemion, 2013;Gardner, 2008b;Golde, 2005;Lovitts, 2005;Sallee, 2011). Based on this conceptualization of preparation for faculty careers, the people and practices that help to socialize individuals are discussed below.…”
Section: Prior Research: Preparation For and Interest In Faculty Careersmentioning
confidence: 99%