2002
DOI: 10.1126/science.1069587
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

What's New, Pussycat? On Talking to Babies and Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

29
355
10
11

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 336 publications
(405 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
29
355
10
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the emotional salience in PDS is not rated as strongly as in IDS, it is significantly higher than in ADS (Burnham et al, 2002). The increased emotional expression in IDS is thought to communicate intentions to the infant (Fernald, 1989), and it may be that the exaggerated emotional expression in PDS also influences responses in dogs.…”
Section: Emotional Informationmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although the emotional salience in PDS is not rated as strongly as in IDS, it is significantly higher than in ADS (Burnham et al, 2002). The increased emotional expression in IDS is thought to communicate intentions to the infant (Fernald, 1989), and it may be that the exaggerated emotional expression in PDS also influences responses in dogs.…”
Section: Emotional Informationmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Although both men and women used PDS, the female owners spent significantly more time speaking to their dogs and were more likely to use PDS (Prato-Previde et al, 2006). It is interesting to note, however, that owners may be inherently sensitive to the limited linguistic abilities of their dogs: vowel hyperarticulation, a critical component of IDS thought to be specific to the teaching of language, is absent from PDS (Burnham et al, 2002).…”
Section: Emotional Informationmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The exaggerated patterns facilitate the discrimination between the phonemes or sounds. Similarly to what happens with infants, several works have investigated modifications of speech registers when talking to animals [24], foreigners [20], or robots [25][26][27]. The important conclusion from this literature is the existence of common prosodic characteristics usually termed as expanded intonation contours (or Fernald's prototypical contours) [19,22] due to their exaggerated contours: modulations of the fundamental frequency (F0) (mean, range).…”
Section: Expanded Intonation Contoursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research on IDS has shown that phonetic categories in IDS tend to be more distinct (Malsheen 1980;Masataka 1992;Andruski and Kuhl 1996;Kuhl et al 1997;Burnham et al 2002;Liu et al 2007;Cristià 2010) when compared to ADS. It has been argued that the distinct phonetic categories in IDS serve to provide the infant with input that is optimized for learning certain aspects of the linguistic system (Kuhl et al 1997;de Boer and Kuhl 2003;Kirchhoff and Schimmel 2005).…”
Section: Devoicing In Idsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An extensive body of research has examined in what ways IDS differs from adult-directed speech (ADS) among the world's languages (see Soderstrom 2007 for a review). For example, IDS is characterized by overall higher pitch (Ferguson 1964;Fernald and Simon 1984), a greater pitch range (Fernald and Simon 1984), larger pitch peaks on focused words (Fernald and Mazzie 1991), slower speech rate (Bryant and Barrett 2007), and more distinct phonetic categories (Malsheen 1980;Masataka 1992;Andruski and Kuhl 1996;Kuhl et al 1997;Burnham et al 2002;Liu et al 2007;Cristià 2010) when compared to ADS. In the literature, these characteristics of IDS have been argued to play important roles in communication between infants and caregivers, such as capturing the infants' attention, communicating affect, and facilitating the infants' language development (e.g., Fernald 1989;Kitamura et al 2002).…”
Section: Infant-directed Speech (Ids)mentioning
confidence: 99%